Reply to "Comment on 'Significance of the highest occupied Kohn-Sham eigenvalue'"

被引:36
作者
Kleinman, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas, Dept Phys, Austin, TX 78712 USA
来源
PHYSICAL REVIEW B | 1997年 / 56卷 / 24期
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevB.56.16029
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
I give an additional argument that the proof of Perdew et al., stating that the highest occupied Kohn-Sham eigenvalue equals the ionization energy, is flawed. I also argue that the new proof given by Perdew and Levy in the preceding paper is wrong. The significance of the result for the two-electron "Hooke's atom" is then discussed. [S0163-1829(98)04103-4].
引用
收藏
页码:16029 / 16030
页数:2
相关论文
共 9 条