Symptomatic efficacy and safety of diacerein in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials

被引:59
作者
Bartels, E. M. [1 ,2 ]
Bliddal, H. [1 ,3 ]
Schondorff, P. K. [1 ]
Altman, R. D. [4 ]
Zhang, W. [5 ]
Christensen, R. [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Frederiksberg Univ Hosp, Musculoskeletal Stat Unit, Parker Inst, DK-2000 Copenhagen F, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Lib, Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Aalborg Univ, Ctr Sensory Motor Interact, Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[5] Univ Nottingham, City Hosp, Acad Rheumatol, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[6] Univ So Denmark, Inst Sports Sci & Clin Biomech, Odense, Denmark
关键词
Diacerein; Placebo; Osteoarthritis; Knee; Hip; Meta-analysis; KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS; DOUBLE-BLIND; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; HARPAGOPHYTUM-PROCUMBENS; OARSI RECOMMENDATIONS; DIACERHEIN; MANAGEMENT; DIACETYLRHEIN; INTERLEUKIN-1;
D O I
10.1016/j.joca.2009.10.006
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To estimate the efficacy and safety of diacerein as a pain-reducing agent in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), using meta-analysis of published randomized placebo-controlled trials (RCTs). Methods: Systematic searches of the bibliographic databases Medline, Embase, Cinahl, Chemical Abstracts, Cochrane and Web of Science for RCTs concerning diacerein treatment of OA. Inclusion criteria: explicit statement about randomization to either diacerein or placebo, and co-primary outcomes being reduction in pain and improvement in function. Efficacy effect size (ES) was estimated using Hedges's standardized mean difference. Safety was measured via the risk ratio (FIR) of patients having at least one episode of diarrhoea, or withdrawal due to adverse events. Trials were combined by using random-effects meta-analysis. Consistency was evaluated via the I-squared index. Results: Six trials (seven sub-studies; 1533 patients) contributed to the meta-analysis, revealing a large degree of inconsistency among the trials (I-2 = 56%) in regard to pain reduction: the combined ES was -0.24 [95% confidence intervals (Cl): -0.39 to -0.08, P = 0.003], favouring diacerein. The statistically significant improvement in function (P = 0.01) was based on a small amount of heterogeneity (I-2 = 11%), but presented a questionable clinical effect size (ES = -0.14). Risk of publication bias could not be excluded, and trials with duration of more than 6 months did not favour diacerein. There was an increased risk of diarrhoea with diacerein (FIR = 3.51 [2.55-4.83], P < 0.0001), and some withdrawal from therapy following adverse events (FIR = 1.58 [1.05-2.36], P = 0.03). Conclusions: Diacerein may be an alternative therapy for OA for patients who cannot take paracetamol or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) because of adverse effects or lack of benefit. However, it is associated with increased risk of diarrhoea, and the symptomatic benefit after 6 months remains unknown. (C) 2009 Osteoarthritis Research Society International. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 296
页数:8
相关论文
共 80 条
[1]  
Agrati A. M., 1995, Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche, V154, P209
[2]  
ALTMAN RD, 1991, J RHEUMATOL, V18, P10
[3]  
Arend W P, 1995, Adv Intern Med, V40, P365
[4]  
ASCHERL R, 1994, DOUBLE BLIND P UNPUB
[5]  
Bellamy N, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P799
[6]   Role of coxibs in the strategies for gastrointestinal protection in patients requiring chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory therapy [J].
Blandizzi, Corrado ;
Tuccori, Marco ;
Colucci, Rocchina ;
Fornai, Matteo ;
Antonioli, Luca ;
Ghisu, Narcisa ;
Del Tacca, Mario .
PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 59 (02) :90-100
[7]  
BOITTIN M, 1993, REV RHUM, V60, pS68
[8]   Untitled [J].
Brun, PH .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 1997, 5 (04) :289-291
[9]  
CAO X, 2007, XIANDAI ZHONGXIYI JI, V16, P5399
[10]   Efficacy and tolerance of Harpagophytum procumbens versus diacerhein in treatment of osteoarthritis [J].
Chantre, P ;
Cappelaere, A ;
Leblan, D ;
Guedon, D ;
Vandermander, J ;
Fournie, B .
PHYTOMEDICINE, 2000, 7 (03) :177-183