Intra-Articular Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Injections Are No Different From Placebo in the Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

被引:46
作者
Dai, Wenli [1 ]
Leng, Xi [2 ]
Wang, Jian [3 ]
Shi, Zhanjun [3 ]
Cheng, Jin [1 ]
Hu, Xiaoqing [1 ]
Ao, Yingfang [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Inst Sports Med, Beijing Key Lab Sports Injuries, Hosp 3, 49 North Garden Rd, Beijing 100191, Peoples R China
[2] Guangzhou Univ Chinese Med, Med Imaging Ctr, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Southern Med Univ, Nanfang Hosp, Dept Orthoped Surg, Guangzhou, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
PLATELET-RICH PLASMA; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT IMPROVEMENT; STEM-CELLS; HYALURONIC-ACID; HIP; CARTILAGE; PROGRESSION; MANAGEMENT; THERAPY; STATE;
D O I
10.1016/j.arthro.2020.10.016
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intra-articular mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) injections for knee oste-oarthritis (OA) treatment. Methods: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library through April 2020 to identify level I randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the clinical efficacy of MSCs versus control treatments for knee OA. Outcomes were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis with random-effects models. Results: A total of 13 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with placebo, there was no significant difference in VAS for pain (mean difference [MD] 1.62, 95% confidence interval [CI -0.60 to 3.85), WOMAC pain score (MD 1.88, 95% CI -0.21 to 3.98), WOMAC function score (MD -0.67, 95% CI -6.54 to 5.19), or WOMAC stiffness score (MD 0.64, 95% CI -0.86 to 2.14) for MSCs. Moreover, the smallest treatment effect of VAS for pain, WOMAC pain score, WOMAC function score, and WOMAC stiffness score did not exceed the minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Additionally, there was no significant difference in percentage of patients crossing the MCID threshold between MSC and placebo groups for VAS for pain (relative risk [RR] 0.93, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.57) or WOMAC total score (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.21). Compared with hyaluronic acid (HA), MSC injection was associated with significantly better improvement in VAS for pain (MD 2.00, 95% CI 0.94 to 3.07), WOMAC pain score (MD 4.58, 95% CI 0.49 to 8.67), WOMAC total score (MD 14.86, 95% CI 10.59 to 19.13), and WOMAC stiffness score (MD 1.85, 95% CI 0.02 to 3.69). However, the smallest treatment effect of VAS for pain, WOMAC pain score, WOMAC function score, and WOMAC stiffness score did not exceed the MCID. Moreover, there was no significant difference in percentage of patients crossing the MCID threshold between MSC and HA groups for WOMAC total score (RR 0.57, 95% CI 0.21 to 1.55). We also found that MSCs did not increase adverse events compared with HA and placebo. Conclusions: Intra-articular MSC injection was not found to be superior to placebo in pain relief and functional improvement for patients with symptomatic knee OA. However, additional direct testing and combination trials of different type of cells, doses, and number of injections of MSCs are required to further enhance clinical decision making for people with symptomatic knee OA. Level of Evidence: I, meta-analysis of level I studies.
引用
收藏
页码:340 / 358
页数:19
相关论文
共 97 条
[1]
The potential of intra-articular injection of chondrogenic-induced bone marrow stem cells to retard the progression of osteoarthritis in a sheep model [J].
Al Faqeh, Hamoud ;
Hamdan, Bin Mohamad Yahya Nor ;
Chen, Hui Cheng ;
Aminuddin, Bin Saim ;
Ruszymah, Bt Hj Idrus .
EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY, 2012, 47 (06) :458-464
[2]
DEVELOPMENT OF CRITERIA FOR THE CLASSIFICATION AND REPORTING OF OSTEOARTHRITIS - CLASSIFICATION OF OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE [J].
ALTMAN, R ;
ASCH, E ;
BLOCH, D ;
BOLE, G ;
BORENSTEIN, D ;
BRANDT, K ;
CHRISTY, W ;
COOKE, TD ;
GREENWALD, R ;
HOCHBERG, M ;
HOWELL, D ;
KAPLAN, D ;
KOOPMAN, W ;
LONGLEY, S ;
MANKIN, H ;
MCSHANE, DJ ;
MEDSGER, T ;
MEENAN, R ;
MIKKELSEN, W ;
MOSKOWITZ, R ;
MURPHY, W ;
ROTHSCHILD, B ;
SEGAL, M ;
SOKOLOFF, L ;
WOLFE, F .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1986, 29 (08) :1039-1049
[3]
Angst F, 2001, ARTHRIT RHEUM-ARTHR, V45, P384, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200108)45:4<384::AID-ART352>3.0.CO
[4]
2-0
[5]
The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: A systematic search and summary of the literature [J].
Bedson, John ;
Croft, Peter R. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
[6]
Properties of Biologic Scaffolds and Their Response to Mesenchymal Stem Cells [J].
Beitzel, Knut ;
McCarthy, Mary Beth ;
Cote, Mark P. ;
Russell, Ryan P. ;
Apostolakos, John ;
Ramos, Daisy M. ;
Kumbar, Sangamesh G. ;
Imhoff, Andreas B. ;
Arciero, Robert A. ;
Mazzocca, Augustus D. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (03) :289-298
[7]
A RANDOM-EFFECTS REGRESSION-MODEL FOR METAANALYSIS [J].
BERKEY, CS ;
HOAGLIN, DC ;
MOSTELLER, F ;
COLDITZ, GA .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 1995, 14 (04) :395-411
[8]
Osteoarthritis: an update with relevance for clinical practice [J].
Bijlsma, Johannes W. J. ;
Berenbaum, Francis ;
Lafeber, Foris P. J. G. .
LANCET, 2011, 377 (9783) :2115-2126
[9]
Joint space width of the tibiofemoral and of the patellofemoral joint in chronic knee pain with or without radiographic osteoarthritis:: a 2-year follow-up [J].
Boegård, TL ;
Rudling, O ;
Petersson, IF ;
Jonsson, K .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2003, 11 (05) :370-376
[10]
Is Local Viscosupplementation Injection Clinically Superior to Other Therapies in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses [J].
Campbell, Kirk A. ;
Erickson, Brandon J. ;
Saltzman, Bryan M. ;
Mascarenhas, Randy ;
Bach, Bernard R., Jr. ;
Cole, Brian J. ;
Verma, Nikhil N. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2015, 31 (10) :2036-+