USER-GENERATED CONTENT AND GATEKEEPING AT THE BBC HUB

被引:81
作者
Harrison, Jackie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sheffield, Dept Journalism Studies, Sheffield S1 3NJ, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
BBC; gatekeeping; news values; UGC; INITIATIVES;
D O I
10.1080/14616700903290593
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
This is an observational study of the way the BBC deals with user-generated content (UGC) at its UGC hub. It finds four types of UGC. First a form of unsolicited news story: second a form of solicited content for specific extant news stories; third a form of expeditious content for specific items and features, and fourth a form of audience watchdog content. The study also finds that UGC is routinely moderated by the BBC hub and that traditional gatekeeping barriers have evolved over time to ensure the maintenance of core BBC news values. The study concludes with the view that the extensive use of UGC at the BBC hub encourages the increasing use of osoft journalismo, with as yet unknown consequences for the BBC.
引用
收藏
页码:243 / 256
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, REPUBLIC COM 2 0
[2]  
[Anonymous], OWN NEWS
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, UGC THEBBC UNDERSTAN
[4]   PARTICIPATORY JOURNALISM PRACTICES IN THE MEDIA AND BEYOND An international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers [J].
Domingo, David ;
Quandt, Thorsten ;
Heinonen, Ari ;
Paulussen, Steve ;
Singer, Jane B. ;
Vujnovic, Marina .
JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2008, 2 (03) :326-342
[5]  
Harrison J., 2000, TERRESTRIAL TV NEWS
[6]  
HARRISON J, FREEDOM EXP IN PRESS
[7]   A CLASH OF CULTURES The integration of user-generated content within professional journalistic frameworks at British newspaper websites [J].
Hermida, Alfred ;
Thurman, Neil .
JOURNALISM PRACTICE, 2008, 2 (03) :343-356
[8]  
NEIL R, 2004, STATEMENT BOARD GOVE
[9]  
Paulussen S., 2008, WESTMINSTER PAPERS C, V5, P24, DOI DOI 10.16997/WPCC.63
[10]   "Comment Is Free, but Facts Are Sacred": User-generated Content and Ethical Constructs at the Guardian [J].
Singer, Jane B. ;
Ashman, Ian .
JOURNAL OF MASS MEDIA ETHICS, 2009, 24 (01) :3-21