Flux decline study during ultrafiltration of glycerin-rich fatty acid solutions

被引:45
作者
Amin, Indok Nurul Hasyimah Mohd [1 ]
Mohammad, Abdul Wahab [1 ]
Markom, Mastura [1 ]
Peng, Leo Choe [2 ]
Hilal, Nidal [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kebangsaan Malaysia, Dept Chem & Proc Engn, Fac Engn & Built Environm, Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia
[2] Monash Univ, Sch Engn, Bandar Sunway 46150, Selangor, Malaysia
[3] Univ Nottingham, Ctr Clean Water Technol, Fac Engn, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
关键词
Fouling; Flux decline; Membrane material; Cut-off; Hydrophobic; Hydrophilic; HYDROPHOBIC SOLUTE; OIL CONSTITUENTS; MOLECULAR-WEIGHT; MEMBRANES; POLYETHERSULFONE; PERFORMANCE; DEHYDRATION; PERMEATION; REDUCTION; SUNFLOWER;
D O I
10.1016/j.memsci.2010.01.033
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Clarification of glycerin-rich solution is required within the oleochemical industry. Ultrafiltration (UF) could be an option for this purpose. However, flux decline during the UF process is a problem since glycerin-rich solution contains fatty acids which tend to condense in the membrane pores. The main objective of the present paper was to contribute towards better understanding of membrane fouling caused by fatty acids and to investigate the effects of membrane hydrophobicity, molecular weight cutoff and temperature on the membrane fouling. Flux reduction was examined for two different types of polymeric membrane materials with different molecular weight cut-offs (MWCO). The membrane materials were polyethersulphone (PES) based and polyvinylidenefluoride (PVDF) based, with MWCOs between 5, 20 and 25 kDa for the PES membranes, and 30 kDa for the PVDF. It was clearly observed that the addition of fatty acids to the glycerin-rich solution caused significant flux decline, even though the molecular weights of water, glycerin and fatty acids are much smaller than the membrane MWCOs. Additionally, experimental results indicated that the more hydrophobic PES membrane was more severely fouled compared to the PVDF membrane due to the chemical nature of the membrane material itself. The relative flux of PES membranes with larger MWCO decreased by up to 33% compared to 5.6% with smaller ones, but did not vary significantly with operating temperature. The surface morphology and the roughness of fresh and fouled membranes were observed using scanning electron microscopy and atomic force microscopy. (C) 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:75 / 86
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   Impact of chemical cleaning on properties and functioning of polyethersulfone membranes [J].
Arkhangelsky, Elizabeth ;
Kuzmenko, Denis ;
Gitis, Vitaly .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2007, 305 (1-2) :176-184
[2]   Roughness and hydrophobicity studies of nanofiltration membranes using different modes of AFM [J].
Boussu, K ;
Van der Bruggen, B ;
Volodin, A ;
Snauwaert, J ;
Van Haesendonck, C ;
Vandecasteele, C .
JOURNAL OF COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 2005, 286 (02) :632-638
[3]   Influence of pH on the adsorptive fouling of ultrafiltration membranes by fatty acid [J].
Brinck, J ;
Jönsson, AS ;
Jönsson, B ;
Lindau, J .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2000, 164 (1-2) :187-194
[4]   Dehydration of glycerine-water mixtures by pervaporation [J].
Burshe, MC ;
Sawant, SB ;
Pangarkar, VG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OIL CHEMISTS SOCIETY, 1999, 76 (02) :209-214
[5]   Influence of adsorption and concentration polarisation on membrane performance during ultrafiltration of a non-ionic surfactant [J].
Byhlin, H ;
Jönsson, AS .
DESALINATION, 2003, 151 (01) :21-31
[6]   Effect of TiO2 nanoparticle size on the performance of PVDF membrane [J].
Cao, Xiaochun ;
Ma, Jun ;
Shi, Xuehua ;
Ren, Zhijun .
APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2006, 253 (04) :2003-2010
[7]   EFFECT OF ADSORPTIVE FOULING ON MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE - CASE-STUDY WITH A PULP-MILL EFFLUENT [J].
DALCIN, MM ;
STRIEZ, CN ;
TWEDDLE, TA ;
CAPES, CE ;
MCLELLAN, F ;
BUISSON, H .
DESALINATION, 1995, 101 (02) :155-167
[8]   Sunflower oil miscella degumming with polyethersulfone membranes -: Effect of process conditions and MWCO on fluxes and rejections [J].
García, A ;
Alvarez, S ;
Riera, F ;
Alvarez, R ;
Coca, J .
JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 2006, 74 (04) :516-522
[9]  
Jeromin L., 1996, U.S. Patent, Patent No. [5,527,974 A, 5527974]
[10]  
Jonsson A.-S., 1998, SEP SCI TECHNOL, V4, P503