Comparison of QuEChERS sample preparation methods for the analysis of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables

被引:816
作者
Lehotay, Steven J. [1 ]
Son, Kyung Ae [2 ]
Kwon, Hyeyoung [2 ]
Koesukwiwat, Urairat [1 ,3 ]
Fu, Wusheng [4 ]
Mastovska, Katerina [1 ]
Hoh, Eunha [1 ]
Leepipatpiboon, Natchanun [3 ]
机构
[1] ARS, USDA, Eastern Reg Res Ctr, Wyndmoor, PA 19038 USA
[2] Natl Acad Agr Sci, Rural Dev Adm, Suwon 441707, South Korea
[3] Chulalongkorn Univ, Fac Sci, Dept Chem, Chromatog & Separat Res Unit, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
[4] Fujian Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
关键词
QuEChERS; Pesticide residue analysis; Sample preparation; Gas chromatography; Liquid chromatography; Mass spectrometry; Fruits and vegetables; SOLID-PHASE EXTRACTION; PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHY; QUADRUPOLE MASS-SPECTROMETRY; FAST GAS-CHROMATOGRAPHY; MULTIRESIDUE ANALYTICAL METHOD; ETHYL-ACETATE EXTRACTION; BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTICS; LOW-TEMPERATURE CLEANUP; GC-MS ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.chroma.2010.01.044
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
This article describes the comparison of different versions of an easy, rapid and low-cost sample preparation approach for the determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables by concurrent use of gas and liquid chromatography (GC and LC) coupled to mass spectrometry (MS) for detection. The sample preparation approach is known as QuEChERS, which stands for "quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe". The three compared versions were based on the original unbuffered method, which was first published in 2003, and two interlaboratory validated versions: AOAC Official Method 2007.01, which uses acetate buffering, and European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Standard Method EN 15662, which calls for citrate buffering. LC-MS/MS and GC-MS analyses using each method were tested from 50 to 1000 ng/g in apple-blueberry sauce, peas and limes spiked with 32 representative pesticides. As expected, the results were excellent (overall average of 98% recoveries with 10% RSD) using all 3 versions, except the unbuffered method gave somewhat lower recoveries for the few pH-dependent pesticides. The different methods worked equally well for all matrices tested with equivalent amounts of matrix co-extractives measured, matrix effects on quantification and chemical noise from matrix in the chromatographic backgrounds. The acetate-buffered version gave higher and more consistent recoveries for pymetrozine than the other versions in all 3 matrices and for thiabendazole in limes. None of the versions consistently worked well for chlorothalonil, folpet or tolylfluanid in peas, but the acetate-buffered method gave better results for screening of those pesticides. Also, due to the recent shortage in acetonitrile (MeCN), ethyl acetate (EtOAc) was evaluated as a substitute solvent in the acetate-buffered QuEChERS version, but it generally led to less clean extracts and lower recoveries of pymetrozine, thiabendazole, acephate, methamidophos, omethoate and dimethoate. In summary, the acetate-buffered version of QuEChERS using MeCN exhibited advantages compared to the other tested methods in the study. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:2548 / 2560
页数:13
相关论文
共 102 条
[1]   Multi-residue determination of veterinary drugs in milk by ultra-high-pressure liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Aguilera-Luiz, M. M. ;
Martinez Vidal, Jose Luis ;
Romero-Gonzalez, Roberto ;
Garrido Frenich, Antonia .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2008, 1205 (1-2) :10-16
[2]   Dispersive Solid Phase Extraction for In-Sorbent Surface Attenuated Total Reflection Infrared Detection [J].
Alcudia-Leon, M. C. ;
Lucena, R. ;
Cardenas, S. ;
Valcarcel, M. .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 2009, 81 (03) :1184-1190
[3]   Evaluation of analyte protectants to improve gas chromatographic analysis of pesticides [J].
Anastassiades, M ;
Mastovská, K ;
Lehotay, SJ .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2003, 1015 (1-2) :163-184
[4]  
Anastassiades M, 2003, J AOAC INT, V86, P412
[5]  
Anastassiades M., 2007, CROP PROTECTION PUBL, DOI [DOI 10.1002/9783527611249.CH46, 10.1002/9783527611249.ch46]
[6]   Validation of an efficient method for the determination of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables using ethyl acetate for extraction [J].
Aysal, Perihan ;
Ambrus, Arpad ;
Lehotay, Steven J. ;
Cannavan, Andrew .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND HEALTH PART B-PESTICIDES FOOD CONTAMINANTS AND AGRICULTURAL WASTES, 2007, 42 (05) :481-490
[7]   Validation and uncertainty analysis of a multi-residue method for pesticides in grapes using ethyl acetate extraction and liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry [J].
Baneriee, Kaushik ;
Oulkar, Dasharath P. ;
Dasgupta, Soma ;
Patil, Shubhangi B. ;
Patil, Sangrarn H. ;
Savant, Rahul ;
Adsule, Pandurang G. .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 2007, 1173 (1-2) :98-109
[8]  
Banerjee K, 2008, J AOAC INT, V91, P1435
[9]   Multiresidue Determination and Uncertainty Analysis of 87 Pesticides in Mango by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry [J].
Banerjee, Kaushik ;
Oulkar, Dasharath P. ;
Patil, Shubhangi B. ;
Jadhav, Manjusha R. ;
Dasgupta, Soma ;
Patil, Sangram H. ;
Bal, Sunita ;
Adsule, Pandurang G. .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2009, 57 (10) :4068-4078
[10]   Applications of sample preparation techniques in the analysis of pesticides and PCBs in food [J].
Beyer, Angelika ;
Biziuk, Marek .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2008, 108 (02) :669-680