Measures of social outcomes in disability research

被引:125
作者
Dijkers, MPJM
Whiteneck, G
El-Jaroudi, R
机构
[1] CUNY Mt Sinai Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Craig Hosp, Englewood, CO USA
[3] Wayne State Univ, Detroit, MI USA
[4] Rehabil Inst Michigan, Detroit, MI USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2000年 / 81卷 / 12期
关键词
disabled persons; research; outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation;
D O I
10.1053/apmr.2000.20627
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To describe instruments that have been developed to quantify (aspects of) social outcomes in research on persons with a disability, and to evaluate the clinimetric characteristics of some of the more prominent and promising measures. Data Sources: Literature in social health, social psychiatry, developmental disabilities, independent living, gerontology, medical rehabilitation, and quality of life studies. Study Selection: Social outcomes are defined as those changes or differences in the social functioning (broadIy defined) of persons with disabilities that result directly or indirectly from impairments and functional limitations. Excluded were measures that focus on purely physical or psychologic aspects of functioning, apply to children only, or quantify 1 social domain only. Data Extraction: For 16 instruments the distribution of items across the participation domains of the International Classification of Impairments, Activities, and Participation is presented, as well as a distribution of items by metrics used. For 5, clinimetric information from published studies were reviewed and summarized in letter grades. Data Synthesis: Several instruments have broad coverage, acceptable respondent burden, and moderate to good reliability, validity, and sensitivity. Conclusions: Social outcomes should be more routinely included in disability and rehabilitation research. Recommendations for selection and further development are made.
引用
收藏
页码:S63 / S80
页数:18
相关论文
共 147 条
[1]  
ANDERSON DJ, 1992, AM J MENT RETARD, V96, P488
[2]  
ANDREASSEN E M, 1981, Fauna Norvegica Series A, V2, P1
[3]   Health-related quality of life outcomes measures [J].
Andresen, EM ;
Meyers, AR .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2000, 81 (12) :S30-S45
[4]  
[Anonymous], J REHABIL OUTCOMES M
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[6]   Methodological challenges in measurements of functional ability in gerontological research. A review [J].
Avlund, K .
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1997, 9 (03) :164-174
[7]   A NORMATIVE SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT SCALE [J].
BARRABEE, P ;
BARRABEE, EL ;
FINESINGER, JE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1955, 112 (04) :252-259
[8]  
Bond M J, 1992, Disabil Rehabil, V14, P27
[9]   Clinical applications of the Adelaide Activities Profile [J].
Bond, MJ ;
Clark, MS .
CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 1998, 12 (03) :228-237
[10]   LIFE-STYLE ACTIVITIES OF THE ELDERLY - COMPOSITION AND DETERMINANTS [J].
BOND, MJ ;
CLARK, MS ;
SMITH, DS ;
HARRIS, RD .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 17 (02) :63-69