Comparative study of international academic rankings of universities

被引:137
作者
Buela-Casal, Gualberto
Gutierrez-Martinez, Olga [1 ]
Bermudez-Sanchez, Maria Paz
Vadillo-Munoz, Oscar
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Fac Psicol, Granada 18011, Spain
[2] Univ Madrid, Agencia Calidad Acreditac & Prospect, Madrid 3, Spain
关键词
High Education Institution; Ranking System; Academic Ranking; Academic Quality; League Table;
D O I
10.1007/s11192-007-1653-8
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 [计算机应用技术]; 0835 [软件工程];
摘要
International academic rankings that compare world universities have proliferated recently. In accordance with latter conceptual and methodological advances in academic rankings approaches, five selection criteria are defined and four international university rankings are selected. A comparative analysis of the four rankings is presented taking into account both the indicators frequency and its weights. Results show that, although some indicators differ considerably across selected rankings and even many indicators are unique, indicators referred to research and scientific productivity from university academic staff have a prominent role across all approaches. The implications of obtained data for main rankings consumers are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 365
页数:17
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
*ANECA, 2005, PROGR EV I GUIA EV E
[2]
[Anonymous], HIGHER ED EUROPE
[3]
[Anonymous], 2003, International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology, DOI DOI 10.1080/09515080020007599
[4]
[Anonymous], 2002, Higher Education in Europe
[5]
[Anonymous], HIGHER ED EUROPE
[6]
*ASIAWEEK, 2000, AS BEST U 2000
[7]
Measuring internationality: Reflections and perspectives on academic journals [J].
Buela-Casal, G ;
Perakakis, P ;
Taylor, M ;
Checa, P .
SCIENTOMETRICS, 2006, 67 (01) :45-65
[8]
Buela-Casal G, 2005, INT J CLIN HLTH PSYC, V5, P175
[9]
BUELACASAL G, 2005, C CURS EV ACCR PROGR
[10]
BUELACASAL G, 2006, UNPUB ESTUDIO COMPAR