Can basic individual differences shed light on the construct meaning of assessment center evaluations?

被引:53
作者
Collins, JM [1 ]
Schmidt, FL
Sanchez-Ku, M
Thomas, L
McDaniel, MA
Le, H
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Leadership & Management Program, E Lansing, MI 48907 USA
[2] Texas A&M Univ, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
[3] Univ Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[4] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Richmond, VA 23284 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1468-2389.00223
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The construct meaning of assessment center evaluations is an important unresolved issue in I/O psychology. This study hypothesized that Cognitive Ability and personality traits are primary correlates of evaluators' overall assessment ratings (OARS). Metaanalysis results based on 65 correlations indicate the following mean construct-level correlations with OARS:.67 for Cognitive Ability, .50 for Extraversion, .35 for Emotional Stability, .25 for Openness, and .17 for Agreeableness; yielding a multiple R of .84. These findings support our hypothesis and cast light on the construct meaning of assessment center evaluations.
引用
收藏
页码:17 / 29
页数:13
相关论文
共 113 条
[1]   Intelligence, personality, and interests: Evidence for overlapping traits [J].
Ackerman, PL ;
Heggestad, ED .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1997, 121 (02) :219-245
[2]   EMPIRICAL DISTRIBUTIONS OF RANGE RESTRICTED SDX IN VALIDITY STUDIES [J].
ALEXANDER, RA ;
ALLIGER, GM ;
CARSON, KP ;
CRONSHAW, SF .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 74 (02) :253-258
[3]  
*AM PSYCH ASS, 1999, APA TEST STAND
[4]  
[Anonymous], EXECUTIVE DEV PREPAR
[5]  
[Anonymous], PERSONNEL J
[6]  
[Anonymous], INT REV IND ORG PSYC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1992, ASSESSMENT CTR HUMAN
[8]  
ARCHAMBEAU DJ, 1979, J ASSESSMENT CTR TEC, P7
[9]   THE BIG 5 PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB-PERFORMANCE - A METAANALYSIS [J].
BARRICK, MR ;
MOUNT, MK .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 44 (01) :1-26
[10]   Effects of Impression management and self-deception on the predictive validity of personality constructs [J].
Barrick, MR ;
Mount, MK .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 81 (03) :261-272