Reduction of chromate from electroplating wastewater from pH 1 to 2 using fluidized zero valent iron process

被引:123
作者
Chen, Shiao-Shing
Cheng, Chih-Yu
Li, Chi-Wang
Chai, Pao-Hsuan
Chang, Yu-Min
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Inst Environm Engn & Management, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Tamkang Univ, Dept Water Resources & Environm Engn, Tamsui 251, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
fluidized bed; zero valent iron; chromate; electroplating wastewater; XRD;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.08.029
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Fluidized zero valent iron (ZVI) process was conducted to reduce hexavalent chromium (chromate, CrO42-) to trivalent chromium (Cr3+) from electroplating wastewater due to the following reasons: (1) Extremely low pH (1-2) for the electroplating wastewater favoring the ZVI reaction. (2) The ferric ion, produced from the reaction of Cr(VI) and ZVI, can act as a coagulant to assist the precipitation of Cr(OH)(3(s)) to save the coagulant cost. (3) Higher ZVI utilization for fluidized process due to abrasive motion of the ZVI. For influent chromate concentration of 418 mg/L as Cr6+, pH 2 and ZVI dosage of 3 g (41 g/L), chromate removal was only 29% with hydraulic detention time (HRT) of 1.2 min, but was increased to 99.9% by either increasing HRT to 5.6 min or adjusting pH to 1.5. For iron species at pH 2 and HRT of 1.2 min, Fe3+ was more thermodynamically stable since oxidizing agent chromate was present. However, if pH was adjusted to 1.5 or 1, where chromate was completely removed, high Fe2+ but very low Fe3+ was present. It can be explained that ZVI reacted with chromate to produce Fe2+ first and the presence of chromate would keep converting Fe2+ to Fe3+. Therefore, Fe2+ is an indicator for complete reduction from Cr(VI) to Cr(III). X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted to exam the remained species at pH 2. ZVI, iron oxide and iron sulfide were observed, indicating the formation of iron oxide or iron sulfide could stop the chromate reduction reaction. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 367
页数:6
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   In-situ remediation of Cr(VI)-contaminated groundwater using permeable reactive walls: Laboratory studies [J].
Blowes, DW ;
Ptacek, CJ ;
Jambor, JL .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 1997, 31 (12) :3348-3357
[2]   ZERO-VALENT IRON FOR THE IN-SITU REMEDIATION OF SELECTED METALS IN GROUNDWATER [J].
CANTRELL, KJ ;
KAPLAN, DI ;
WIETSMA, TW .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 1995, 42 (02) :201-212
[3]   Chromate reduction in wastewater at different pH levels using thin iron wires - A laboratory study [J].
Chang, LY .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2005, 24 (03) :305-316
[4]   Alternative chromium reduction and heavy metal precipitation methods for industrial wastewater [J].
Chang, LY .
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRESS, 2003, 22 (03) :174-182
[5]   Fluidized zero valent iron bed reactor for nitrate removal [J].
Chen, YM ;
Li, CW ;
Chen, SS .
CHEMOSPHERE, 2005, 59 (06) :753-759
[6]  
Chew CF, 1998, WATER SCI TECHNOL, V38, P135, DOI 10.1016/S0273-1223(98)00615-5
[7]   Degradation of TCE, Cr(VI), sulfate, and nitrate mixtures by granular iron in flow-through columns under different microbial conditions [J].
Gandhi, S ;
Oh, BT ;
Schnoor, JL ;
Alvarez, PJJ .
WATER RESEARCH, 2002, 36 (08) :1973-1982
[8]  
[Greenberg A.E. Standard Methods Standard Methods], 1998, STANDARD METHODS EXA, V20th
[9]   Removal of chromium from synthetic plating waste by zero-valent iron and sulfate-reducing bacteria [J].
Guha, S ;
Bhargava, P .
WATER ENVIRONMENT RESEARCH, 2005, 77 (04) :411-416
[10]   Nitrate reduction by metallic iron [J].
Huang, CP ;
Wang, HW ;
Chiu, PC .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (08) :2257-2264