Long-Run Equilibrium Modeling of Emissions Allowance Allocation Systems in Electric Power Markets

被引:107
作者
Zhao, Jinye [1 ]
Hobbs, Benjamin F. [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Pang, Jong-Shi [5 ]
机构
[1] ISO New England, Holyoke, MA 01040 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Geog & Environm Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Appl Math & Stat, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
[4] ECN, Policy Studies Unit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[5] Univ Illinois, Dept Ind & Enterprise Syst Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
TRADING SCHEME; EU-ETS; OUTPUT; COMPETITIVENESS; INCENTIVES; ABATEMENT;
D O I
10.1287/opre.1090.0771
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Carbon dioxide allowance trading systems for electricity generators are in place in the European Union and in several U.S. states. An important question in the design of such systems is how allowances are to be initially allocated: by auction, by giving away fixed amounts (grandfathering), or by allocating based on present or recent output, investment, or other decisions. The latter system can bias investment, operations, and product pricing decisions and increase costs relative to the other systems. A nonlinear complementarity model is proposed for investigating the long-run equilibria that would result under alternative systems for power markets characterized by time-varying demand and multiple technology types. Existence of equilibria is shown under mild conditions. Solutions for simple systems show that allocating allowances to new capacity based on fuel use or generator type can yield large distortions in capacity investment, invert the operating order of power plants, and inflate consumer costs. The distortions can be smaller for tighter CO2 restrictions and are somewhat mitigated if there is also a market for electricity capacity or minimum-run restrictions on coal plants. Distortions are also less if allowances are allocated to plants in proportion to sales rather than capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 548
页数:20
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Åhman M, 2006, CLIM POLICY, V6, P423
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Finite-Dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems
[3]  
BARTELS M, 2006, DO TECHNOLOGY SPECIF
[4]  
BURTRAW D, 2001, 0130 RFF DP
[5]  
Demailly D, 2006, CLIM POLICY, V6, P93
[6]   Cost-effectiveness of the performance standard system to reduce CO2 emissions in Canada:: a general equilibrium analysis [J].
Dissou, Y .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2005, 27 (03) :187-207
[7]  
Facchinei F., 2003, SPRINGER SERIES OPER, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-0-387-21815-16
[8]  
FISCHER C, 2001, 0122 RFF DP
[9]   Output-based allocation of emissions permits for mitigating tax and trade interactions [J].
Fischer, Carolyn ;
Fox, Alan K. .
LAND ECONOMICS, 2007, 83 (04) :575-599
[10]   Allocation and competitiveness in the EU emissions trading scheme: policy overview [J].
Grubb, Michael ;
Neuhoff, Karsten .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2006, 6 (01) :7-30