Cosmological parameters from supernova observations: A critical comparison of three data sets

被引:228
作者
Choudhury, TR
Padmanabhan, T
机构
[1] SISSA, ISAS, I-34014 Trieste, Italy
[2] IUCAA, Pune 411007, Maharashtra, India
来源
ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS | 2005年 / 429卷 / 03期
关键词
supernovae : general; cosmology : miscellaneous; cosmological parameters;
D O I
10.1051/0004-6361:20041168
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We extend our previous analysis of cosmological supernova type Ia data (Padmanabhan & Choudhury 2003) to include three recent compilation of data sets. Our analysis ignores the possible correlations and systematic effects present in the data and concentrates mostly on some key theoretical issues. Among the three data sets, the first set consists of 194 points obtained from various observations while the second discards some of the points from the first one because of large uncertainties and thus consists of 142 points. The third data set is obtained from the second by adding the latest 14 points observed through HST. A careful comparison of these different data sets help us to draw the following conclusions: (i) All the three data sets strongly rule out non-accelerating models. Interestingly, the first and the second data sets favour a closed universe; if Omega(tot) equivalent to Omega(m) + Omega(Lambda), then the probability of obtaining models with Omega(tot) > 1 is greater than or similar to0.97. Hence these data sets are in mild disagreement with the "concordance" flat model. However, this disagreement is reduced ( the probability of obtaining models with. tot > 1 being approximate to0.9) for the third data set, which includes the most recent points observed by HST around 1 < z < 1.6. (ii) When the first data set is divided into two separate subsets consisting of low (z < 0.34) and high (z > 0.34) redshift supernova, it turns out that these two subsets, individually, admit non-accelerating models with zero dark energy because of different magnitude zero-point values for the different subsets. This can also be seen when the data is analysed while allowing for possibly different magnitude zero-points for the two redshift subsets. However, the non-accelerating models seem to be ruled out using only the low redshift data for the other two data sets, which have less uncertainties. (iii) We have also found that it is quite difficult to measure the evolution of the dark energy equation of state w(X)(z) though its present value can be constrained quite well. The best-fit value seems to mildly favour a dark energy component with current equation of state w(X) < -1, thus opening the possibility of existence of more exotic forms of matter. However, the data is still consistent with the the standard cosmological constant at 99 per cent confidence level for Omega(m) greater than or similar to 0.2.
引用
收藏
页码:807 / 818
页数:12
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   The case for dynamical dark energy revisited [J].
Alam, U ;
Sahni, V ;
Starobinsky, AA .
JOURNAL OF COSMOLOGY AND ASTROPARTICLE PHYSICS, 2004, (06) :113-128
[2]   Phenomenology of a realistic accelerating Universe using only Planck-scale physics [J].
Albrecht, A ;
Skordis, C .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2000, 84 (10) :2076-2079
[3]   Cosmic acceleration in brane cosmology [J].
Alcaniz, JS ;
Pires, N .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2004, 70 (04)
[4]   Testing dark energy beyond the cosmological constant barrier [J].
Alcaniz, JS .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2004, 69 (08) :5
[5]  
[Anonymous], APJ
[6]  
ASTIER P, 2000, ASTROPH0008306
[7]   Cosmology with tachyon field as dark energy [J].
Bagla, JS ;
Jassal, HK ;
Padmanabhan, T .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2003, 67 (06)
[8]   Quintessence arising from exponential potentials [J].
Barreiro, T ;
Copeland, EJ ;
Nunes, NJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW D, 2000, 61 (12)
[9]   Twenty-three high-redshift supernovae from the Institute for Astronomy Deep Survey:: Doubling the supernova sample at z &gt; 0.7 [J].
Barris, BJ ;
Tonry, JL ;
Blondin, S ;
Challis, P ;
Chornock, R ;
Clocchiatti, A ;
Filippenko, AV ;
Garnavich, P ;
Holland, ST ;
Jha, S ;
Kirshner, RP ;
Krisciunas, K ;
Leibundgut, B ;
Li, WD ;
Matheson, T ;
Miknaitis, G ;
Riess, AG ;
Schmidt, BP ;
Smith, RC ;
Sollerman, J ;
Spyromilio, J ;
Stubbs, CW ;
Suntzeff, NB ;
Aussel, H ;
Chambers, KC ;
Connelley, MS ;
Donovan, D ;
Henry, JP ;
Kaiser, N ;
Liu, MC ;
Martín, EL ;
Wainscoat, RJ .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 602 (02) :571-594
[10]   Latest supernova data in the framework of the generalized Chaplygin gas model [J].
Bertolami, O ;
Sen, AA ;
Sen, S ;
Silva, PT .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 2004, 353 (01) :329-337