Application and evaluation of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis to analyse the yeast ecology of wine grapes

被引:227
作者
Prakitchaiwattana, CJ [1 ]
Fleet, GH [1 ]
Heard, GM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Sch Chem Engn & Ind Chem, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
关键词
grape; yeast; ecology; denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis;
D O I
10.1016/j.femsyr.2004.05.004
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The performance of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for analysing yeasts associated with wine grapes was compared with cultural isolation on malt extract agar (MEA). After optimisation of PCR and electrophoretic conditions, the lower limit of yeast detection by PCR-DGGE was 10(2) cfu ml(-1), although this value was affected by culture age and the relative populations of the species in mixed culture. In mixed yeast populations, PCR-DGGE detected species present at 10-100-fold less than other species but not when the ratio exceeded 100-fold. Aureobasidium pullulans was the main species isolated from immature, mature, and both damaged and undamaged grapes. It was not detected by PCR-DGGE when present at populations less than 10(3) cfu g(-1). When approaching maturity, damaged grapes gave a predominance of Metschnikowia and Hanseniaspora species (10(5)-10(7) cfu g(-1)), all detectable using PCR-DGGE. However, various species of Rhodotorula, Rhodosporidium and Cryptococcus were not detected by this method, even when populations were as high as 10(4) cfu g(-1). PCR-DGGE was less sensitive than culture on MEA for determining the yeast ecology of grapes and could not reliably detect species present at populations less than 10(4) cfu g(-1). However, this method detected a greater diversity of species than agar plating. (C) 2004 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 877
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs [J].
Altschul, SF ;
Madden, TL ;
Schaffer, AA ;
Zhang, JH ;
Zhang, Z ;
Miller, W ;
Lipman, DJ .
NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH, 1997, 25 (17) :3389-3402
[2]   PHYLOGENETIC IDENTIFICATION AND IN-SITU DETECTION OF INDIVIDUAL MICROBIAL-CELLS WITHOUT CULTIVATION [J].
AMANN, RI ;
LUDWIG, W ;
SCHLEIFER, KH .
MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1995, 59 (01) :143-169
[3]   MICROBIOLOGY OF WINEMAKING [J].
AMERINE, MA ;
KUNKEE, RE .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF MICROBIOLOGY, 1968, 22 :323-+
[4]  
Ampe F, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P5464
[5]  
Andrews A.T., 1986, ELECTROPHORESIS THEO
[6]  
[Anonymous], FUNGAL SYSTEMATICS F
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2003, YEASTS FOOD BENEFICI
[8]   Endophytic fungi in branches of Norway spruce with particular reference to Tryblidiopsis pinastri [J].
Barklund, P ;
Kowalski, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE BOTANIQUE, 1996, 74 (05) :673-678
[9]  
Boekhout T., 2003, YEAST FOOD BENEFICIA, P69, DOI DOI 10.1533/9781845698485.69
[10]   Aureobasidium pullulans (LS-30) an antagonist of postharvest pathogens of fruits:: study on its modes of action [J].
Castoria, R ;
De Curtis, F ;
Lima, G ;
Caputo, L ;
Pacifico, S ;
De Cicco, V .
POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 22 (01) :7-17