Oceans apart: conservation models for two temperate penguin species shaped by the marine environment

被引:15
作者
Boersma, P. Dee
Rebstock, Ginger A.
Stokes, David L.
Majluf, P.
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Dept Biol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Interdisciplinary Arts & Sci, Bothell, WA 98011 USA
[3] Univ Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Unidad Biol Conservac, Lima 18, Peru
关键词
Spheniscus magellanicus; Magellanic penguin; Spheniscus humboldti; Humboldt penguin; foraging range; conservation model; marine protected area; management zone;
D O I
10.3354/meps335217
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Oceanographic productivity patterns in the breeding areas of Magellanic penguins Spheniscus magellanicus in the Atlantic differ from those of Humboldt penguins S. humboldti in the Pacific. We used satellite telemetry to compare foraging trips between 2 Humboldt penguin females with chicks and 44 Magellanic penguin females with eggs or chicks. The Humboldt penguins took trips of short duration and distance, with fewer than 10% of locations > 25 km from the colony. Magellanic penguins traveled longer and more variable distances. Only 24% of locations during chick rearing were within 25 km of the colony; all 8 incubation trips reached distances greater than 100 km. Among Magellanic penguins, foraging trip duration was significantly correlated with distance from the colony during all stages of the breeding season (incubation r(2) = 0.66; early chick r(2) = 0.75; late chick r(2) = 0.91). For each hour of trip duration, penguins ranged nearly 1 km farther from the colony. For the 2 Humboldt females, trip duration was correlated with maximum distance from the colony for one female but not the other, whose trip duration varied little. Trip duration for Magellanic penguins determined by nest checks was correlated with duration determined by satellite telemetry (r(2) = 0.96), making nest checks a potentially inexpensive and minimally disturbing estimator of foraging trip distance and changing food availability. The large difference in foraging distance between the species reflects the distribution of productivity in their foraging areas and shows that protecting the species requires conservation models that are effective on different spatial scales.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 225
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Marine fronts at the continental shelves of austral South America Physical and ecological processes [J].
Acha, EM ;
Mianzan, HW ;
Guerrero, RA ;
Favero, M ;
Bava, J .
JOURNAL OF MARINE SYSTEMS, 2004, 44 (1-2) :83-105
[2]  
BANNASCH R, 1994, J EXP BIOL, V194, P83
[3]  
Boersma P., 1990, PENGUIN BIOL, P13
[4]   Applying ecology to conservation: tracking breeding penguins at New Island South Reserve, Falkland Islands [J].
Boersma, PD ;
Stokes, DL ;
Strange, IJ .
AQUATIC CONSERVATION-MARINE AND FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEMS, 2002, 12 (01) :63-74
[5]   Limiting abuse: marine protected areas, a limited solution [J].
Boersma, PD ;
Parrish, JK .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1999, 31 (02) :287-304
[6]   Sex differences in Adelie penguin foraging strategies [J].
Clarke, J ;
Manly, B ;
Kerry, K ;
Gardner, H ;
Franchi, E ;
Corsolini, S ;
Focardi, S .
POLAR BIOLOGY, 1998, 20 (04) :248-258
[7]  
Crawford RJM, 1999, S AFR J MARINE SCI, V21, P145
[8]  
Croxall J. P., 1999, Marine Ornithology, V27, P1
[9]  
Culik B, 2000, J EXP BIOL, V203, P2311
[10]  
Davis L.S., 2003, Penguins