Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories

被引:146
作者
Auger, J
Eustache, F
Ducot, B
Blandin, T
Daudin, M
Diaz, I
El Matribi, S
Gony, B
Keskes, L
Kolbezen, M
Lamarte, A
Lornage, J
Nomal, N
Pitaval, G
Simon, O
Virant-Klun, I
Spira, A
Jouannet, P
机构
[1] Hop Cochin, CECOS, Serv Biol Reprod, F-75014 Paris, France
[2] CHU Bicetre, INSERM, U292, F-94276 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
[3] Hop Pellegrin, CECOS Aquitaine, F-33076 Bordeaux, France
[4] Hop La grave, CECOS Midi Pyrenees, Ctr Sterilite Masculine, F-31052 Toulouse, France
[5] Clin Marly, Unidad Fertilidad Procreat Medicamente Asistida, Bogota, Colombia
[6] CHU Cote Nacre, CECOS Basse Normandie, F-14033 Caen, France
[7] Fac Med, Histol Lab, Sfax, Tunisia
[8] Univ Ljubljana, Klin Ctr, Gynekol Klin, Ljubljana, Slovenia
[9] Hop Edouard Herriot, CECOS Lyon, Reprod Biol Lab, F-69373 Lyon, France
[10] CHU Pointre Pitre, Antenne CECOS, Serv Anat Pathol, F-97159 Guadeloupe, France
[11] Hop Hotel Dieu, CECOS Ouest, Reprod Biol Lab, F-35000 Rennes, France
关键词
quality control; routine semen analysis;
D O I
10.1093/humrep/15.11.2360
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The aim of the present study was to assess variability in the evaluation of human sperm concentration, motility and vitality, Technicians and biologists from 10 teams involved in multicentre studies on semen quality attended the same laboratory, each team using its own methods and equipment to analyse the same semen samples. Inter-individual variability was assessed from 17 fresh semen samples of varying quality. Intra-individual variability was assessed from pools of frozen samples for sperm concentration and motility and stained smears for vitality with three blind evaluations by sample and smear. The mean inter-individual coefficients of variation mere 22.9, 21.8 and 17.5% for sperm concentration, motility and vitality respectively. There was no statistical difference among participants for sperm concentration assessment, but significant differences for both motility and vitality (both P < 0.05). The mean intraindividual coefficients of variation were 15.8, 26.2 and 13.1% for sperm concentration, motility and vitality respectively, with marked differences between expert and novice participants: concentration 9.8% versus 28.0%; motility 22.8% versus 33.0%; and vitality 10.0% versus 19.3%. The present data confirm the need for external quality control schemes for diagnostic purposes, and indicate their utmost importance in multicentre studies on semen quality.
引用
收藏
页码:2360 / 2368
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, WHO laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction
[2]   Evidence for regional differences of semen quality among fertile French men [J].
Auger, J ;
Jouannet, P .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1997, 12 (04) :740-745
[3]  
AUGER J, 1989, J ANDROL, V10, P439
[4]   DECLINE IN SEMEN QUALITY AMONG FERTILE MEN IN PARIS DURING THE PAST 20 YEARS [J].
AUGER, J ;
KUNSTMANN, JM ;
CZYGLIK, F ;
JOUANNET, P .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (05) :281-285
[5]  
Björndahl L, 1998, STUD PROFERLIT, V8, P91
[6]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[7]   DECREASING QUALITY OF SEMEN [J].
BRAKE, A ;
KRAUSE, W .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6867) :1498-1498
[8]   EVIDENCE FOR DECREASING QUALITY OF SEMEN DURING PAST 50 YEARS [J].
CARLSEN, E ;
GIWERCMAN, A ;
KEIDING, N ;
SKAKKEBAEK, NE .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 305 (6854) :609-613
[9]   IMPLEMENTING COMPREHENSIVE QUALITY-CONTROL IN THE ANDROLOGY LABORATORY [J].
CLEMENTS, S ;
COOKE, ID ;
BARRATT, CLR .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (08) :2096-2106
[10]  
COOPER TG, 1992, FERTIL STERIL, V58, P172