An empirical test of Woody and Bowers's dissociated-control theory of hypnosis

被引:54
作者
Jamieson, GA [1 ]
Sheehan, PW
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Dept Psychol, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London SW7 2AZ, England
关键词
D O I
10.1080/0020714049052349
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Woody and Bowers's dissociated-control theory predicts impaired performance on tasks indexing frontally mediated supervisory attentional functions during hypnosis, especially for high susceptibles. This prediction is tested using Stroop task behavioral performance to measure aspects of anterior-mediated supervisory attentional function. All measures of anterior-mediated attentional functions significantly declined during hypnosis. Interactions between susceptibility and hypnosis condition showed specific changes among hypnotized high susceptibles. Total Stroop errors (failures of attentional suppression) were significantly higher in hypnosis for high, but not low, susceptibles. Tellegen's experiential mental set was highest for hypnotized highs. Use of rehearsal strategy (instrumental set) decreased significantly in hypnosis but more so for highs than lows. Results suggest that "absorption" in hypnosis may be a consequence of dissociated anterior attentional control. It is proposed that dissociated control emerges from the functional disconnection of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 249
页数:18
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMIRI [J].
Banich, MT ;
Milham, MP ;
Atchley, RA ;
Cohen, NJ ;
Webb, A ;
Wszalek, T ;
Kramer, AF ;
Liang, ZP ;
Barad, V ;
Gullett, D ;
Shah, C ;
Brown, C .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (1-2) :1-9
[2]   Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Botvinick, M ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Fissell, K ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
NATURE, 1999, 402 (6758) :179-181
[3]   HYPNOTIZABILITY AND AUTOMATICITY - TOWARD A PARALLEL DISTRIBUTED-PROCESSING MODEL OF HYPNOTIC RESPONDING [J].
DIXON, M ;
BRUNET, A ;
LAURENCE, JR .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 99 (04) :336-343
[4]  
DONOVAN PB, 1989, THESIS U QUEENSLAND
[5]   Introspective physicalism as an approach to the science of consciousness [J].
Jack, AI ;
Shallice, T .
COGNITION, 2001, 79 (1-2) :161-196
[6]  
Jamieson A. G., 2002, CONT HYPNOSIS, V19, P62, DOI DOI 10.1002/CH.243
[7]   Hypnosis and event-related potential correlates of error processing in a stroop-type paradigm: a test of the frontal hypothesis [J].
Kaiser, J ;
Barker, R ;
Haenschel, C ;
Baldeweg, T ;
Gruzelier, JH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1997, 27 (03) :215-222
[8]   Dissociation theories of hypnosis [J].
Kirsch, I ;
Lynn, SJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1998, 123 (01) :100-115
[9]   Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control [J].
MacDonald, AW ;
Cohen, JD ;
Stenger, VA ;
Carter, CS .
SCIENCE, 2000, 288 (5472) :1835-1838
[10]   Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention [J].
MacLeod, CM ;
MacDonald, PA .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (10) :383-391