The Safety and Effectiveness of the Retrievable Option Inferior Vena Cava Filter: A United States Prospective Multicenter Clinical Study

被引:79
作者
Johnson, Matthew S. [1 ]
Nemcek, Albert A., Jr. [2 ]
Benenati, James F. [3 ]
Baumann, Dirk S. [4 ]
Dolmatch, Bart L. [5 ]
Kaufman, John A. [6 ]
Garcia, Mark J. [7 ]
Stecker, Michael S. [8 ]
Venbrux, Anthony C. [9 ]
Haskal, Ziv J. [10 ]
Avelar, Rui L. [11 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] NW Mem Hosp, Dept Radiol, Sect Intervent Radiol, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[3] Baptist Cardiac & Vasc Inst, Miami, FL USA
[4] Mill Peninsula Med Ctr, Vein Clin, Burlingame, CA USA
[5] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Div Intervent Radiol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[6] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Dotter Intervent Inst, Portland, OR 97201 USA
[7] Christiana Hosp, Sect Vasc & Intervent Radiol, Newark, DE USA
[8] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[9] George Washington Univ, Dept Radiol, Washington, DC USA
[10] Univ Maryland, Med Ctr, Div Vasc & Intervent Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[11] Angiotech Pharmaceut, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvir.2010.04.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the retrievable Option inferior vena cava (IVC) filter in patients at risk for pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter; single-arm clinical trial. Subjects (N = 100) underwent implantation of the IVC filter and were followed for 180 days; subjects whose filters were later removed were followed for 30 days thereafter. The primary objective was to determine whether the one-sided lower limit of the 95% CI for the observed clinical success rate was at least 80%. Clinical success was defined as technical success (deployment of the filter such that it was judged suitable for mechanical protection from PE) without subsequent PE, significant filter migration or embolization, symptomatic caval thrombosis, or other complications. RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 100% of subjects. There were eight cases of recurrent PE, two cases of filter migration (23 mm), and three cases of symptomatic caval occlusion/thrombosis (one in a subject who also experienced filter migration). No filter embolization or fracture occurred. Clinical success was achieved in 88% of subjects; the one-sided lower limit of the 95% CI was 81%. Retrieval was successful at a mean of 67.1 days after implantation (range, 1-175 d) for 36 of 39 subjects (92.3%). All deaths (n = 17) and deep vein thromboses (n = 18) were judged to have resulted from preexisting or intercurrent illnesses or interventions and unrelated to the filter device; all deaths were judged to be unrelated to PE. CONCLUSIONS: Placement and retrieval of the Option IVC filter were performed safely and with high rates of clinical success.
引用
收藏
页码:1173 / 1184
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
Chung J, 2008, CAN FAM PHYSICIAN, V54, P49
[2]   The use of confidence or fiducial limits illustrated in the case of the binomial. [J].
Clopper, CJ ;
Pearson, ES .
BIOMETRIKA, 1934, 26 :404-413
[3]   Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis [J].
Cushman, Mary .
SEMINARS IN HEMATOLOGY, 2007, 44 (02) :62-69
[4]   Eight-year follow-up of patients with permanent vena cava filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism - The PREPIC (Prevention du Risque d'Embolie Pulmonaire par Interruption Cave) randomized study [J].
Decousus, H ;
Barral, FG ;
Buchmuller-Cordier, A ;
Charbonnier, B ;
Girard, P ;
Lamer, C ;
Laporte, A ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
Mismetti, P ;
Parent, F ;
Quenet, S ;
Rivron-Guillot, K ;
Tardy, B .
CIRCULATION, 2005, 112 (03) :416-422
[5]   A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis [J].
Decousus, H ;
Leizorovicz, A ;
Parent, F ;
Page, Y ;
Tardy, B ;
Girard, P ;
Laporte, S ;
Faivre, R ;
Charbonnier, B ;
Barral, FG ;
Huet, Y ;
Simonneau, G .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 338 (07) :409-415
[6]  
Grassi Clement J, 2003, J Vasc Interv Radiol, V14, pS271
[7]   Guidelines for the use of retrievable and convertible vena cava filters: Report from the Society of Interventional Radiology multidisciplinary consensus conference [J].
Kaufman, JA ;
Kinney, TB ;
Streiff, MB ;
Sing, RF ;
Proctor, MC ;
Becker, D ;
Cipolle, M ;
Comerota, AJ ;
Millward, SF ;
Rogers, FB ;
Sacks, D ;
Venbrux, AC .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 17 (03) :449-459
[8]   Optional vena cava filters: What, why, and when [J].
Kaufman, John A. .
VASCULAR, 2007, 15 (05) :304-313
[9]   Development of a Research Agenda for Inferior Vena Cava Filters: Proceedings from a Multidisciplinary Research Consensus Panel [J].
Kaufman, John A. ;
Rundback, John H. ;
Kee, Stephen T. ;
Geerts, William ;
Gillespie, David ;
Kahn, Susan R. ;
Kearon, Clive ;
Rectenwald, John ;
Rogers, Frederick B. ;
Stavropoulos, S. William ;
Streiff, Michael ;
Vedantham, Suresh ;
Venbrux, Anthony .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 20 (06) :697-707
[10]   Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease [J].
Kearon, Clive ;
Kahn, Susan R. ;
Agnelli, Giancarlo ;
Goldhaber, Samuel ;
Raskob, Gary E. ;
Comerota, Anthony J. .
CHEST, 2008, 133 (06) :454S-545S