Consumer willingness to pay price premiums for environmentally certified wood products in the US

被引:177
作者
Aguilar, Francisco X. [1 ]
Vlosky, Richard P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Renewable Nat Resources, Louisiana Forest Prod Dev Ctr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
environmentally certiried wood products; WTP; price premiums; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.forpol.2006.12.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since its inception nearly 15 years ago, environmental certification has become an important issue in the wood products industry. One research question that has been examined is the potential willingness for supply chain participants to pay a premium for certified products or raw materials to offset certification costs. This study examines stated willingness to pay for four wood products from the perspective of U.S. consumers. Data was collected in 1995 and 2005 from the population of U.S. residential consumers to detect changes in willingness to pay for certified wood products along time and increase the statistical strength of the model. Results of an ordered probit model suggest that higher probabilities of paying a premium are associated to consumers who seek out certified products and who believe certification can lessen environmental impacts such as tropical deforestation. There is also a strong relationship between respondent income and willingness-to-pay. Despite the current industry structure in the U.S. that has adopted a mass-certification strategy that does not place price premiums on certified products, results suggest that such premiums may exist for imported certified tropical wood products. Analysis of marginal effects suggests consumers' willingness to pay a 10% premium for three of the four certified items studied. Niche markets may potentially be exploited in the U.S. and price premiums captured by wood products manufacturers in tropical regions and/or American importers. (C) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1112
页数:13
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Anderson RC, 2005, FOREST PROD J, V55, P21
[2]  
Anderson RC, 2004, J FOREST, V102, P28
[3]   ESTIMATING NONRESPONSE BIAS IN MAIL SURVEYS [J].
ARMSTRONG, JS ;
OVERTON, TS .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1977, 14 (03) :396-402
[4]  
ATYI RE, 2002, TECHNICAL SERIES ITT, V19
[5]   Certifying forests and factories: States, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest products fields [J].
Bartley, T .
POLITICS & SOCIETY, 2003, 31 (03) :433-464
[6]   Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany [J].
Cashore, B ;
van Kooten, GC ;
Vertinsky, I ;
Auld, G ;
Affolderbach, J .
FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2005, 7 (01) :53-69
[7]  
Cubbage F, 2003, J FOREST, V101, P26
[8]   Do consumers care about ethics? Willingness to pay for fair-trade coffee [J].
De Pelsmacker, P ;
Driesen, L ;
Rayp, G .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, 2005, 39 (02) :363-385
[9]  
Dillman DA., 2000, Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method
[10]   Modeling multiple adoption decisions in a joint framework [J].
Dorfman, JH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1996, 78 (03) :547-557