Animal testing and alternative approaches for the human health risk assessment under the proposed new European chemicals regulation

被引:166
作者
Höfer, T [1 ]
Gerner, I [1 ]
Gundert-Remy, U [1 ]
Liebsch, M [1 ]
Schulte, A [1 ]
Spielmann, H [1 ]
Vogel, R [1 ]
Wettig, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Bundesinst Risikobewertung, D-14195 Berlin, Germany
关键词
animal experiments; EU chemicals policy; hazard assessment; regulatory toxicology; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1007/s00204-004-0577-9
中图分类号
R99 [毒物学(毒理学)];
学科分类号
100405 ;
摘要
During the past 20 years the EU legislation for the notification of chemicals has focussed on new chemicals and at the same time failed to cover the evaluation of existing chemicals in Europe. Therefore, in a new EU chemicals policy ( REACH, Registration, Evaluation and Authorisation of Chemicals) the European Commission proposes to evaluate 30,000 chemicals within a period of 15 years. We are providing estimates of the testing requirements based on our personal experiences during the past 20 years. A realistic scenario based on an in-depth discussion of potential toxicological developments and an optimised "tailor-made'' testing strategy shows that to meet the goals of the REACH policy, animal numbers may be significantly reduced below 10 million if industry would use in-house data from toxicity testing, which are confidential, if nonanimal tests would be used, and if information from quantitative structure activity relationships ( QSARs) would be applied in substance-tailored testing schemes. The procedures for evaluating the reproductive toxicity of chemicals have the strongest impact on the total number of animals bred for testing under REACH. We are assuming both an active collaboration with our colleagues in industry and substantial funding of the development and validation of advanced non-animal methods by the EU Commission, specifically in reproductive and developmental toxicity.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 564
页数:16
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], STSGAC1030 UN
[2]  
Balls M, 1999, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM, V27, P53
[3]   The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test [J].
Balls, M ;
Botham, PA ;
Bruner, LH ;
Spielmann, H .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1995, 9 (06) :871-929
[4]  
Balls M., 2002, ATLA S1, V30, P1
[5]   Toxicoproteomics - a new preclinical tool [J].
Bandara, LR ;
Kennedy, S .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2002, 7 (07) :411-418
[6]   Appendix II - Practical application of non-whole animal alternatives: Summary of IRAG workshop on eye irritation testing [J].
Bradlaw, J ;
Gupta, K ;
Green, S ;
Hill, R ;
Wilcox, N .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1997, 35 (01) :175-178
[7]   A summary report of the COLIPA international validation study on alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye irritation test [J].
Brantom, PG ;
Bruner, LH ;
Chamberlain, M ;
DeSilva, O ;
Dupuis, J ;
Earl, LK ;
Lovell, DP ;
Pape, WJW ;
Uttley, M ;
Bagley, DM ;
Baker, FW ;
Bracher, M ;
Courtellemont, P ;
Declercq, I ;
Freeman, S ;
Steiling, W ;
Walker, AP ;
Carr, GJ ;
Dami, N ;
Thomas, G ;
Harbell, J ;
Jones, PA ;
Pfannenbecker, U ;
Southee, JA ;
Tcheng, M ;
Argembeaux, H ;
Castelli, D ;
Clothier, R ;
Esdaile, DJ ;
Itigaki, H ;
Jung, K ;
Kasai, Y ;
Kojima, H ;
Kristen, U ;
Larnicol, M ;
Lewis, RW ;
Marenus, K ;
Moreno, O ;
Peterson, A ;
Rasmussen, ES ;
Robles, C ;
Stern, M .
TOXICOLOGY IN VITRO, 1997, 11 (1-2) :141-179
[8]  
Brown NA, 1995, ATLA-ALTERN LAB ANIM, V23, P868
[9]   An overall strategy for the testing of chemicals for human hazard and risk assessment under the EU REACH system [J].
Combes, R ;
Barratt, M ;
Balls, M .
ATLA-ALTERNATIVES TO LABORATORY ANIMALS, 2003, 31 (01) :7-19
[10]  
CORTON JC, 1999, CIIT ACTIVITIES, V19