An empirical Bayesian solution to the source reconstruction problem in EEG

被引:146
作者
Phillips, C
Mattout, J
Rugg, MD
Maquet, P
Friston, KJ
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Ctr Rech Cyclotron, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[2] UCL, Inst Neurol, Wellcome Dept Imaging Neurosci, London, England
[3] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Neurobiol Learning & Memory, Irvine, CA 92717 USA
关键词
EEG; restricted maximum likelihood (ReML) solution; expectation-maximisation (EM) procedure; source reconstruction; distributed solution;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.10.030
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Distributed linear solutions of the EEG source localisation problem are used routinely. In contrast to discrete dipole equivalent models, distributed linear solutions do not assume a fixed number of active sources and rest on a discretised fully 3D representation of the electrical activity of the brain. The ensuing inverse problem is underdetermined and constraints or priors are required to ensure the uniqueness of the solution. In a Bayesian framework, the conditional expectation of the source distribution, given the data, is attained by carefully balancing the minimisation of the residuals induced by noise and the improbability of the estimates as determined by their priors. This balance is specified by hyperparameters that control the relative importance of fitting and conforming to various constraints. Here we formulate the conventional "Weighted Minimum Norm" (WMN) solution in terms of hierarchical linear models. An "Expectation-Maximisation" (EM) algorithm is used to obtain a "Restricted Maximum Likelihood" (ReML) estimate of the hyperparameters, before estimating the "Maximum a Posteriori" solution itself. This procedure can be considered a generalisation of previous work that encompasses multiple constraints. Our approach was compared with the "classic" WMN and Maximum Smoothness solutions, using a simplified 2D source model with synthetic noisy data. The ReML solution was assessed with four types of source location priors: no priors, accurate priors, inaccurate priors, and both accurate and inaccurate priors. The ReML approach proved useful as: (1) The regularisation (or influence of the a priori source covariance) increased as the noise level increased. (2) The localisation error (LE) was negligible when accurate location priors were used. (3) When accurate and inaccurate location priors were used simultaneously, the solution was not influenced by the inaccurate priors. The ReML solution was then applied to real somatosensory-evoked responses to illustrate the application in an empirical setting. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:997 / 1011
页数:15
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Multistart algorithms for MEG empirical data analysis reliably characterize locations and time courses of multiple sources [J].
Aine, C ;
Huang, M ;
Stephen, J ;
Christner, R .
NEUROIMAGE, 2000, 12 (02) :159-172
[2]  
ANDINO SG, 2001, INT J BIOELECTROMAGN, V3
[3]   LOCATION OF SOURCES OF EVOKED SCALP POTENTIALS - CORRECTIONS FOR SKULL AND SCALP THICKNESSES [J].
ARY, JP ;
KLEIN, SA ;
FENDER, DH .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1981, 28 (06) :447-452
[4]   UNIQUENESS IN INVERSION OF INACCURATE GROSS EARTH DATA [J].
BACKUS, G ;
GILBERT, F .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES A-MATHEMATICAL AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES, 1970, 266 (1173) :123-&
[5]   Inverse electrocardiography by simultaneous imposition of multiple constraints [J].
Brooks, DH ;
Ahmad, GF ;
MacLeod, RS ;
Maratos, GM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1999, 46 (01) :3-18
[6]  
CUFFIN BN, 1979, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, V47, P132, DOI 10.1016/0013-4694(79)90215-3
[7]   ESTIMATION IN COVARIANCE COMPONENTS MODELS [J].
DEMPSTER, AP ;
RUBIN, DB ;
TSUTAKAWA, RK .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1981, 76 (374) :341-353
[8]   NON-CEPHALIC REFERENCE RECORDING OF EARLY SOMATOSENSORY POTENTIALS TO FINGER STIMULATION IN ADULT OR AGING NORMAL MAN - DIFFERENTIATION OF WIDESPREAD N18 AND CONTRALATERAL N20 FROM THE PREROLANDIC P22 AND N30 COMPONENTS [J].
DESMEDT, JE ;
CHERON, G .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1981, 52 (06) :553-570
[9]   Classical and Bayesian inference in neuroimaging: Theory [J].
Friston, KJ ;
Penny, W ;
Phillips, C ;
Kiebel, S ;
Hinton, G ;
Ashburner, J .
NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 16 (02) :465-483
[10]   INTERPRETING MAGNETIC-FIELDS OF THE BRAIN - MINIMUM NORM ESTIMATES [J].
HAMALAINEN, MS ;
ILMONIEMI, RJ .
MEDICAL & BIOLOGICAL ENGINEERING & COMPUTING, 1994, 32 (01) :35-42