Gender differences in lower extremity mechanics during running

被引:471
作者
Ferber, R [1 ]
Davis, IM
Williams, DS
机构
[1] Univ Delaware, MckInly Lab 301, Dept Phys Therapy, Newark, DE 19716 USA
[2] Joyner Sportsmed Inst, Mechanicsburg, PA 17111 USA
[3] E Carolina Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Greenville, NC 27858 USA
关键词
male; female; running mechanics; kinematics; kinetics;
D O I
10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00025-1
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. To compare differences in hip and knee kinematics and kinetics in male and female recreational runners. Design. Gait analysis of 20 men and 20 women recreational runners. Background Female runners are reported to be more likely to sustain certain lower extremity injuries compared to their male counterparts. This has been attributed, in part, to differences in their structure and it has been postulated that these structural differences may lead to differences in running mechanics. It was hypothesized that females would exhibit greater peak hip adduction, hip internal rotation, knee abduction and decreased knee internal rotation compared to their male counterparts. It was also hypothesized that females would exhibit greater hip and knee negative work in the frontal and transverse planes compared to males. Methods. Comparisons of hip and knee three-dimentional joint angles and negative work during the stance phase of running gait were made between genders. Results. Female recreational runners demonstrated a significantly greater peak hip adduction, hip internal rotation and knee abduction angle compared to men. Female recreational runners also demonstrated significantly greater hip frontal and transverse plane negative work compared to male recreational runners. Conclusion. Female recreational runners exhibit significantly different lower extremity mechanics in the frontal and transverse planes at the hip and knee during running compared to male recreational runners.
引用
收藏
页码:350 / 357
页数:8
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
AGLIETTI P, 1983, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P217
[2]   Gender differences in musculoskeletal injury rates: a function of symptom reporting? [J].
Almeida, SA ;
Trone, DW ;
Leone, DM ;
Shaffer, RA ;
Patheal, SL ;
Long, K .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1999, 31 (12) :1807-1812
[3]  
[Anonymous], SPACE REQUIREMENTS S
[4]  
Benas D., 1984, REHABILITATION INJUR, P393
[5]   NORMATIVE DATA OF KNEE-JOINT MOTION AND GROUND REACTION FORCES IN ADULT LEVEL WALKING [J].
CHAO, EY ;
LAUGHMAN, RK ;
SCHNEIDER, E ;
STAUFFER, RN .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1983, 16 (03) :219-233
[6]   Lower limb morphology and risk of overuse injury among male infantry trainees [J].
Cowan, DN ;
Jones, BH ;
Frykman, PN ;
Polly, DW ;
Harman, EA ;
Rosenstein, RM ;
Rosenstein, MT .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1996, 28 (08) :945-952
[7]   ATHLETIC INJURIES - COMPARISON BY AGE, SPORT, AND GENDER [J].
DEHAVEN, KE ;
LINTNER, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 1986, 14 (03) :218-224
[8]   QUADRICEPS FEMORIS MUSCLE ANGLE - NORMAL VALUES AND RELATIONSHIPS WITH GENDER AND SELECTED SKELETAL MEASURES [J].
HORTON, MG ;
HALL, TL .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1989, 69 (11) :897-901
[9]  
HSU RWW, 1990, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P215
[10]   Relationship between vertical ground reaction force and speed during walking, slow jogging, and running [J].
Keller, TS ;
Weisberger, AM ;
Ray, JL ;
Hasan, SS ;
Shiavi, RG ;
Spengler, DM .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1996, 11 (05) :253-259