Validation of referral guidelines for women with pelvic masses

被引:67
作者
Im, SS
Gordon, AN
Buttin, BM
Leath, CA
Gostout, BS
Shah, C
Hatch, KD
Wang, JM
Berman, ML
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Med Ctr, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[2] Baylor Univ, Med Ctr, Dallas, TX USA
[3] Barnes Jewish Hosp, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Univ Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham Hosp, Birmingham, AL USA
[5] Mayo Clin, Rochester, MN USA
[6] Univ Washington, Med Ctr, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[7] Arizona Hlth Sci Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[8] Gynecol Oncol Grp, Stat Off, Buffalo, NY USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000149159.69560.ef
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: Guidelines for referring women with pelvic masses suspicious for ovarian cancers to gynecologic oncologists have been published jointly by Society of Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO) and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (AGOG). They are based on patient age, CA 125 level, physical findings, imaging study results, and family history. Although the guidelines are evidence-based, their predictive value in distinguishing cancers from benign masses is unknown. METHODS: Chart review for factors included in the guidelines of surgically evaluated women with pelvic masses at 7 tertiary care centers during a 12-month interval was performed. This information was used to estimate the predictive values of the SGO and AGOG guidelines in identifying patients with malignant pelvic masses. RESULTS: A total of 1,035 patients were identified, including 318 (30.7%) with primary malignancies of the ovary, fallopian tube, or peritoneum. Seventy-seven were younger than 50 years old (premenopausal group), and 240 were 50 years old or older (postmenopausal group). Fifty additional patients (4.8%) had cancers metastatic to the ovaries, and the remaining 667 (64.4%) had benign masses. The referral guidelines captured 70% of the ovarian cancers in the premenopausal group and 94% of the ovarian cancers in the postmenopausal group. The positive predictive value was 33.8% for the premenopausal group and 59.5% for the postmenopausal group, whereas the negative preddictive values were more than 90% for both groups. Elevated CA 125 level was the single best predictor of malignancy in both groups. CONCLUSION: The SGO and AGOG referral guidelines effectively separate women with pelvic masses into 2 risk categories for malignancy. This distinction permits a rational approach for referring high-risk patients to a gynecologic oncologist for management. (C) 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 41
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
American College of Obstetricians anf G. ACOG Committee Opinion: number 280 December 2002, 2002, OBSTET GYNECOL, V100, P1413, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02630-3, 10.1016/s0029-7844, DOI 10.1016/S0029-7844]
[2]   TUMOR REDUCTION SURGERY AND LONG-TERM SURVIVAL IN ADVANCED OVARIAN-CANCER - A DACOVA STUDY [J].
BERTELSEN, K .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1990, 38 (02) :203-209
[3]   Survival effect of maximal cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian carcinoma during the platinum era: A meta-analysis [J].
Bristow, RE ;
Tomacruz, RS ;
Armstrong, DK ;
Trimble, EL ;
Montz, FJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 20 (05) :1248-1259
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY FOR ADVANCED OVARIAN-CARCINOMA [J].
CHEN, SS ;
BOCHNER, R .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1985, 20 (02) :190-195
[5]   THE IMPACT OF SUBSPECIALTY TRAINING ON THE MANAGEMENT OF ADVANCED OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
EISENKOP, SM ;
SPIRTOS, NM ;
MONTAG, TW ;
NALICK, RH ;
WANG, HJ .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 47 (02) :203-209
[6]  
GRIFFITHS CT, 1975, NATL CANCER I MONOGR, P101
[7]   THE INFLUENCE OF CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY ON RECURRENCE-FREE INTERVAL AND SURVIVAL IN SMALL-VOLUME STAGE-III EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CANCER - A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY GROUP-STUDY [J].
HOSKINS, WJ ;
BUNDY, BN ;
THIGPEN, JT ;
OMURA, GA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 47 (02) :159-166
[8]   Specialist gynaecologists and survival outcome in ovarian cancer: a Scottish national study of 1866 patients [J].
Junor, EJ ;
Hole, DJ ;
McNulty, L ;
Mason, M ;
Young, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1999, 106 (11) :1130-1136
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF THE OPERATING SURGEONS SPECIALIZATION ON PATIENT SURVIVAL IN OVARIAN-CARCINOMA [J].
KEHOE, S ;
POWELL, J ;
WILSON, S ;
WOODMAN, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 70 (05) :1014-1017
[10]   OVARIAN-CANCER STAGING - DOES IT REQUIRE A GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGIST [J].
MAYER, AR ;
CHAMBERS, SK ;
GRAVES, E ;
HOLM, C ;
TSENG, PC ;
NELSON, BE ;
SCHWARTZ, PE .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 47 (02) :223-227