Computed tomographic enteroclysis - One methodology

被引:103
作者
Bender, GN
Timmons, JH
Williard, WC
Carter, J
机构
[1] MADIGAN ARMY MED CTR,DEPT RADIOL,IMAGING SECT,TACOMA,WA 98431
[2] MADIGAN ARMY MED CTR,DEPT SURG,TACOMA,WA 98431
[3] MADIGAN ARMY MED CTR,DEPT DIAGNOST RADIOL,TACOMA,WA 98431
关键词
computed tomography; enteroclysis; small bowel obstruction;
D O I
10.1097/00004424-199601000-00007
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100207 [影像医学与核医学]; 1009 [特种医学];
摘要
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES. Computed tomography (CT) is limited in the assessment of partial small bowel obstruction (SBO). Enteroclysis is preferred but gives little direct information about the bowel wall, mesentery, or remote findings. Preliminary results of a combined CT enteroclysis (CT-E) methodology are reported. METHODS. Forty-eight patients with suspected partial SBO underwent a water soluble contrast enteroclysis followed immediately by CT. Pump rates at fluoroscopy and CT were 75 to 100 cc/min unless a high-grade obstruction was encountered at fluoroscopy. Shrake's criteria for complete, high-grade or low-grade partial SBO were used. RESULTS. The calculated dose per patient was 27 rad for CT-E as opposed to 32 rad with traditional enteroclysis. Site specific sensitivity and specificity for low-grade partial SBO, were 82.1% and 87.5%. One death was encountered in a patient with diffuse abdominal metastatic disease and complete obstruction. This was caused by vomiting and aspiration secondary to tube placement alone, CT-enteroclysis having been aborted. CONCLUSIONS. Computed tomographic enteroclysis is a diagnostic option for evaluation of low-grade partial SBOs. Pitfalls with this technique are encountered in decompressed torsions and hernias.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 49
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]
ANTES G, 1987, SMALL BOWEL RADIOLOG
[2]
3RD TECHNIQUE FOR CONVERTING A GASTROSTOMY TUBE TO A GASTROJEJUNOSTOMY TUBE [J].
BENDER, GN ;
HAGGERTY, MF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (06) :1501-1501
[3]
CT OF SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION - VALUE IN ESTABLISHING THE DIAGNOSIS AND DETERMINING THE DEGREE AND CAUSE [J].
FRAGER, D ;
MEDWID, SW ;
BAER, JW ;
MOLLINELLI, B ;
FRIEDMAN, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (01) :37-41
[4]
CT DIAGNOSIS OF SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION - EFFICACY IN 60 PATIENTS [J].
FUKUYA, T ;
HAWES, DR ;
LU, CC ;
CHANG, PJ ;
BARLOON, TJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1992, 158 (04) :765-769
[5]
EFFICACY OF CT IN DISTINGUISHING SMALL-BOWEL OBSTRUCTION FROM OTHER CAUSES OF SMALL-BOWEL DILATATION [J].
GAZELLE, GS ;
GOLDBERG, MA ;
WITTENBERG, J ;
HALPERN, EF ;
PINKNEY, L ;
MUELLER, PR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1994, 162 (01) :43-47
[6]
HERLINGER H, 1989, CLIN RADIOLOGY SMALL, P479
[7]
SMALL-BOWEL RADIOGRAPHY - HOW, WHEN, AND WHY [J].
MAGLINTE, DDT ;
LAPPAS, JC ;
KELVIN, FM ;
REX, D ;
CHERNISH, SM .
RADIOLOGY, 1987, 163 (02) :297-305
[8]
OBSTRUCTION OF THE SMALL-INTESTINE - ACCURACY AND ROLE OF CT IN DIAGNOSIS [J].
MAGLINTE, DDT ;
GAGE, SN ;
HARMON, BH ;
KELVIN, FM ;
HAGE, JP ;
CHUA, GT ;
NG, AC ;
GRAFFIS, RF ;
CHERNISH, SM .
RADIOLOGY, 1993, 188 (01) :61-64
[9]
BOWEL OBSTRUCTION - EVALUATION WITH CT [J].
MEGIBOW, AJ ;
BALTHAZAR, EJ ;
CHO, KC ;
MEDWID, SW ;
BIRNBAUM, BA ;
NOZ, ME .
RADIOLOGY, 1991, 180 (02) :313-318
[10]
SHRAKE PD, 1991, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V86, P175