Effective slab width definition for negative moment regions of composite bridges

被引:24
作者
Aref, Amjad J. [1 ]
Chiewanichakorn, Methee [1 ]
Chen, Stuart S. [1 ]
Ahn, Il-Sang [1 ]
机构
[1] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Civil Engn, Buffalo, NY 14260 USA
关键词
slabs; shear lag; bridges; composite; girder;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2007)12:3(339)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Currently, the AASHTO-LRFD design code specifies the same effective slat) width design criteria for both positive moment sections and negative moment sections. The only difference in computing effective slab width between the positive and negative moment regions is the value of effective span length (Q, the definition of which is problematic. The effective slab width concept for the positive moment regions has been investigated by many researchers. However, the classical effective slab width definition does not take into account both the strain variation through the slab thickness and the mechanism that redistributes load from concrete to steel reinforcement after cracking. In this paper, a more robust effective slab width definition for the negative moment section is introduced to account for these factors. The proposed definition is developed for negative moment regions and explored by using the finite-element method (FEM). The finite-element modeling scheme is briefly discussed, and the model is successfully verified with experimental results. Numerical results show the simplicity, accuracy, and robustness of the proposed definition in extracting effective slab width values from FEM results. Numerical results also indicate that the effective slab width criteria in the current AASHTO-LRFD Specifications is typically (conservative for larger girder spacings. Detailed calculations of effective slab width for the negative moment regions using the proposed definition are summarized at the end of this paper.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 349
页数:11
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
*AASHTO, 2004, LRFD BRIDG DES SPEC
[2]   Effective width evaluation for steel-concrete composite beams [J].
Amadio, C ;
Fragiacomo, M .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTIONAL STEEL RESEARCH, 2002, 58 (03) :373-388
[3]  
*ANATECH CORP, 1997, ANACAP U CONCR AN PR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 543 NCHRP TRANSP RES
[5]   Effective flange width definition for steel-concrete composite bridge girder [J].
Chiewanichakorn, M ;
Aref, AJ ;
Chen, SS ;
Ahn, IS .
JOURNAL OF STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 130 (12) :2016-2031
[6]  
CHIEWANICHAKORN M, 2005, THESIS STATE U NEW Y
[7]  
*HIBB KARLSS SOR I, 2000, ABAQUS STAND US MAN
[8]  
MOFFATT KR, 1978, J STRUCT DIV-ASCE, V104, P1123
[9]  
Oehlers D. J., 2000, Journal of Bridge Engineering, V5, P91, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:2(91), DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0702(2000)5:2(91)]
[10]   ULTIMATE STRENGTH ANALYSIS OF PRESTRESSED CONCRETE PRESSURE VESSELS [J].
RASHID, YR .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 1968, 7 (04) :334-&