Incorporating land cover information into regional biodiversity assessments in South Africa

被引:35
作者
Wessels, KJ
Reyers, B
Van Jaarsveld, AS
机构
[1] Agr Res Council, Inst Soil Climate & Water, GeoInformat Div, ZA-0001 Pretoria, South Africa
[2] Univ Pretoria, Dept Zool & Entomol, ZA-0002 Pretoria, South Africa
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-1795.2000.tb00088.x
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Anthropogenic natural habitat transformation presents the single most important threat to global biodiversity. Land cover data, based on Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery, were used to derive land use information for the Gauteng, Mpumalanga and Northern provinces of South Africa. The assessment integrated land use data with species presence data (15 x 15 minute grid cell resolution) for butterflies, mammals, birds and endemic vascular plants. The objectives of the present study were: (1) to identify areas at a regional scale where there is a possible conflict between biodiversity conservation interests and current land uses; (2) to investigate the influence of incorporating a land use constraint (LUC) into a conservation area selection algorithm, while taking cognizance of the existing reserve system; (3) to investigate the circumstances of species recorded within these conflict areas. Many grid cells identified as species richness hotspots, rarity hotspots or as part of the complementary network selected by the unconstrained algorithm were in reality largely transformed or modified. These areas should thus be avoided when striving to identify a viable conservation network. Although the LUC algorithm selected more grid cells to represent all species, it succeeded in increasing the percentage of natural vegetation within the selected conservation network and highlighted areas where potential conflicts should be thoroughly investigated at a local scale.
引用
收藏
页码:67 / 79
页数:13
相关论文
共 92 条
[1]   The impact of commercial afforestation on bird populations in Mpumalanga Province, South Africa - Insights from bird-atlas data [J].
Allan, DG ;
Harrison, JA ;
Navarro, RA ;
vanWilgen, BW ;
Thompson, MW .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1997, 79 (2-3) :173-185
[2]  
[Anonymous], ASSESSING CONSERVATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], LOOKING BACK CHANGIN
[4]   An evaluation of representativeness for nature conservation, Hokitika Ecological District, New Zealand [J].
Awimbo, JA ;
Norton, DA ;
Overmars, FB .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1996, 75 (02) :177-186
[5]  
BARNES D L, 1990, Journal of the Grassland Society of Southern Africa, V7, P223
[6]  
BAUDRY J, 1993, LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY AND AGROECOSYSTEMS, P21
[7]   A NEW APPROACH FOR SELECTING FULLY REPRESENTATIVE RESERVE NETWORKS - ADDRESSING EFFICIENCY, RESERVE DESIGN AND LAND SUITABILITY WITH AN ITERATIVE ANALYSIS [J].
BEDWARD, M ;
PRESSEY, RL ;
KEITH, DA .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 1992, 62 (02) :115-125
[8]  
Branch WR, 1995, S AFR J ZOOL, V30, P91
[9]   Fragments past, present and future [J].
Brokaw, N .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1998, 13 (10) :382-383
[10]  
Bronner G., 1995, THESIS U NATAL DURBA