Research designs for studies evaluating the effectiveness of change and improvement strategies

被引:402
作者
Eccles, M
Grimshaw, J
Campbell, M
Ramsay, C
机构
[1] Univ Newcastle Upon Tyne, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4AA, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Ottawa Hlth Res Inst, Clin Epidemiol Programme, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Aberdeen, Hlth Serv Res Unit, Aberdeen, Scotland
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2003年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qhc.12.1.47
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The methods of evaluating change and improvement strategies are not well described. The design and conduct of a range of experimental and non-experimental quantitative designs are considered Such study designs should usually be used in a context where they build on appropriate theoretical, qualitative and modelling work, particularly in the development of appropriate interventions. A range of experimental designs are discussed including single and multiple arm randomised controlled trials and the use of more complex factorial and block designs. The impact of randomisation at both group and individual levels and three non-experimental designs (uncontrolled before and after, controlled before and after, and time series analysis) are also considered. The design chosen will reflect both the needs (and resources) in any particular circumstances and also the purpose of the evaluation. The general principle underlying the choice of evaluative design is, however, simple-those conducting such evaluations should use the most robust design possible to minimise bias and maximise generalisability.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 52
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2013, Clinical trials: a practical approach
[2]
[Anonymous], 1957, EXPT DESIGN
[3]
Campbell D.T., 1966, Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research
[4]
Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health [J].
Campbell, M ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Haines, A ;
Kinmonth, AL ;
Sandercock, P ;
Spiegelhalter, D ;
Tyrer, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262) :694-696
[5]
Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach [J].
Campbell, MK ;
Mollison, J ;
Steen, N ;
Grimshaw, JM ;
Eccles, M .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2000, 17 (02) :192-196
[6]
COCHRANE AL, 1979, EFFECTIVENESS EFFICE
[7]
Cook ThomasD., 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design analysis issues for field settings
[8]
RANDOMIZATION BY GROUP IN STUDYING THE EFFECT OF DRUG INFORMATION IN PRIMARY CARE [J].
DIWAN, VK ;
ERIKSSON, B ;
STERKY, G ;
TOMSON, G .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 21 (01) :124-130
[9]
Some aspects of the design and analysis of cluster randomization trials [J].
Donner, A .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 1998, 47 :95-113
[10]
ESTIMATION OF INTRA-CLASS CORRELATION IN THE ANALYSIS OF FAMILY DATA [J].
DONNER, A ;
KOVAL, JJ .
BIOMETRICS, 1980, 36 (01) :19-25