A multi-centre North Italian prospective survey on some quality parameters in lower gastrointestinal endoscopy

被引:28
作者
Fasoli, R
Repaci, G
Comin, U
Minoli, G
机构
[1] Magenta Hosp, Div Med 2, Gatroenterol & Digest Endocropy Serv, Magenta, MI, Italy
[2] Legnano Gen Hosp, Gastroenterol & Digest Endoscopy Unit, Legnano, MI, Italy
[3] Valduce Hosp, Gastroenterol & Digest Endoscopy Unit, Como, Italy
关键词
colonoscopy; conscious sedation; quality assurance; sigmoidoscopy;
D O I
10.1016/S1590-8658(02)80252-3
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and aim. To record prospectively, in a multi-centre survey, the adherence to some quality parameters of lower digestive endoscopy in everyday practice, focusing in particular on sedation and monitoring; choice of extension of endoscopic examination by the operator and relative performance in intubation of the caecum; behaviour in some particular clinical circumstances, such as fresh haematochezia, screening and surveillance situations, functional symptoms, management of polyps. Patients and Methods. Twenty-five centres located in Lombardia, Italy took part in the study; the duration of the survey was 2 weeks. 1406 consecutive cases were recorded. Results. The main indications to colonoscopy were fresh haematochezia (21%), abdominal pain (11.7%) and surveillance after surgery for tumours or endoscopic polyp removal (24.3%). Screening examinations accounted for 7.1% of all examinations. Conscious sedation was administered in 63.9% of patients; pulse oxymetry and cardiac frequency monitoring was used in 44.2% of cases. Total colonoscopy was planned in 84.2% of cases; the actual rate of intubation of the caecum in the cases submitted to the procedure was 84.1%. Normal results were obtained in 24.3%. In 24.3% of patients, one or more polyps were identified; 84.2% of these were removed during the first examination. Four complications (accounting for 0.28% of cases) were recorded, all after polypectomy and all successfully treated conservatively. Conclusions. The present study has shown that some attitudes in lower digestive endoscopy are sub-optimal: in particular, screening examinations are still infrequent; conscious sedation and monitoring have probably been used too rarely; intubation of the caecum was achieved in <90% of cases; the endoscopic removal of many polyps has been delayed for unexplained reasons. On the other hand, timing of surveillance after surgery for tumours or endoscopic removal of polyps has, overall, been adequate; the I-ate of normal examinations and the rate of complications have been satisfactorily low.
引用
收藏
页码:833 / 841
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
*AM SOC GASTR END, 1999, GASTROINTEST ENDOSC, V50, P921
[2]  
Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy, 2000, Gastrointest Endosc, V52, P831
[3]  
Bell GD, 1991, GUT, V32, P725
[4]  
Carayon P, 2000, ENDOSCOPY, V32, P434
[5]  
CHURCH JM, 1994, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V89, P556
[6]   Oral sodium phosphate versus sulfate-free polyethylene glycol electrolyte lavage solution in outpatient preparation for colonoscopy: A prospective comparison [J].
Clarkston, WK ;
Tsen, TN ;
Dies, DF ;
Schratz, CL ;
Vaswani, SK ;
Bjerregaard, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 1996, 43 (01) :42-48
[7]   How gastroenterologists screen for colonic cancer in ulcerative colitis: an analysis of performance [J].
Eaden, JA ;
Ward, BA ;
Mayberry, JF .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 51 (02) :123-128
[8]  
Early DS, 1999, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V94, P1862
[9]  
EIKA C, 1978, SCAND J HAEMATOL, V21, P349
[10]  
EISENBERG JM, 1982, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V117, P48