Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG on ileal pouch inflammation and microbial flora

被引:210
作者
Kuisma, J
Mentula, S
Jarvinen, H
Kahri, A
Saxelin, M
Farkkila, M
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Helsinki, Finland
[2] Natl Publ Hlth Inst, Dept Microbiol, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Cent Hosp, Dept Surg, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Dept Pathol, Helsinki, Finland
[5] Valio Ltd R&D, Helsinki, Finland
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2036.2003.01465.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Preliminary trials of probiotics in preventing recurrent chronic pouchitis have been encouraging. Aim: To investigate the efficacy of Lactobacillus GG supplementation as primary therapy for ileal pouch inflammation, and its effect on the microbial flora. Methods: Twenty patients, with a previous history of pouchitis and endoscopic inflammation, were recruited for a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of Lactobacillus GG supplementation (10 LGG, 10 placebo) in two gelatine capsules [(0.5-1) x 10(10) colony-forming units/capsule] b.d. for 3 months. Quantitative bacterial culture of fresh faecal samples and biopsies taken from the pouch and afferent limb was performed before and after supplementation. Results: Lactobacillus GG supplementation changed the pouch intestinal flora by increasing the ratio of total faecal lactobacilli to total faecal anaerobes (P = 0.03) and enhancing the frequency of lactobacilli-positive cultures in the pouch and afferent limb mucosal biopsy samples. However, only 40% of patients were colonized with Lactobacillus GG. No differences were observed between the groups with regard to the mean pouchitis disease activity index or the total anaerobes or aerobes of faecal or tissue biopsy samples. Conclusions: A single-strain probiotic bacterium supplement of Lactobacillus GG changed the pouch intestinal bacterial flora, but was ineffective as primary therapy for a clinical or endoscopic response. More clinical trials are needed to evaluate the right placement and dosage of probiotics within a treatment regimen for pouchitis.
引用
收藏
页码:509 / 515
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Recovery of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG from human colonic biopsies [J].
Alander, M ;
Korpela, R ;
Saxelin, M ;
VilpponenSalmela, T ;
MattilaSandholm, T ;
vonWright, A .
LETTERS IN APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1997, 24 (05) :361-364
[2]  
Alander M, 1999, APPL ENVIRON MICROB, V65, P351
[3]  
Apostolou E, 2001, FEMS IMMUNOL MED MIC, V30, P217, DOI 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2001.tb01573.x
[4]   Ecological control of the gastrointestinal tract. The role of probiotic flora [J].
Bengmark, S .
GUT, 1998, 42 (01) :2-7
[5]  
BENNETT RG, 1996, NUTR TODAY S, V31, pS35
[6]  
Benno Y., 1996, NUTR TODAY, V31, p9S
[7]  
FULLER R, 1989, J APPL BACTERIOL, V66, P365
[8]   Oral bacteriotherapy as maintenance treatment in patients with chronic pouchitis: A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial [J].
Gionchetti, P ;
Rizzello, F ;
Venturi, A ;
Brigidi, P ;
Matteuzzi, D ;
Bazzocchi, G ;
Poggioli, G ;
Miglioli, M ;
Campieri, M .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 119 (02) :305-309
[9]   SURVIVAL OF LACTOBACILLUS SPECIES (STRAIN GG) IN HUMAN GASTROINTESTINAL-TRACT [J].
GOLDIN, BR ;
GORBACH, SL ;
SAXELIN, M ;
BARAKAT, S ;
GUALTIERI, L ;
SALMINEN, S .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1992, 37 (01) :121-128
[10]   Probiotics and gastrointestinal health [J].
Gorbach, SL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2000, 95 (01) :S2-S4