The association between pain and disability

被引:119
作者
Turner, JA
Franklin, G
Heagerty, PJ
Wu, R
Egan, K
Fulton-Kehoe, D
Gluck, JV
Wickizer, TM
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Occupat Epidemiol & Hlth Outcomes Program, Dept Environm & Occupat Hlth Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[4] Washington State Dept Labor & Ind, Olympia, WA 98504 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Dept Biostat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Dept Hlth Serv, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
pain intensity; disability; Carpal tunnel syndrome; low back pain; workers' compensation;
D O I
10.1016/j.pain.2004.09.010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
A clearer understanding of how pain intensity relates to disability could have important implications for pain treatment goals and definitions of treatment success. The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal pain intensity rating (0-10 scale) cutpoints for discriminating disability levels among individuals with work-related car-pal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and low back (LB) injuries, whether these cutpoints differed for these conditions and for different disability measures, and whether the relationship between pain intensity and disability was linear in each injury group. Approximately 3 weeks after filing work injury claims, 2183 workers (1059 CTS; 1124 LB) who still had pain completed pain and disability measures. In the LB group, pain intensity rating categories of 1-4, 5-6, and 7-10 optimally discriminated disability levels for all four disability measures examined. In the CTS group, no pain intensity rating categorization scheme proved superior across all disability measures. For all disability measures examined, the relationship between pain intensity and disability level was linear in the CTS group, but nonlinear in the LB group. Among study participants with work-related back injuries, when pain level was 1-4, a decrease in pain of more than 1-point corresponded to clinically meaningful improvement in functioning, but when pain was rated as 5-10, a 2-point decrease was necessary for clinically meaningful improvement in functioning. The findings indicate that classifying numerical pain ratings into categories corresponding to levels of disability may be useful in establishing treatment goals, but that classification schemes must be validated separately for different pain conditions. (C) 2004 International Association for the Study of Pain. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:307 / 314
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Outcome assessment for carpal tunnel surgery: The relative responsiveness of generic, arthritis-specific, disease-specific, and physical examination measures [J].
Amadio, PC ;
Silverstein, MD ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Schleck, CD ;
Jensen, LM .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1996, 21A (03) :338-346
[2]  
[Anonymous], HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT
[3]   Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: A comparison of different instruments [J].
Beurskens, AJHM ;
deVet, HCW ;
Koke, AJA .
PAIN, 1996, 65 (01) :71-76
[4]  
Bombardier C, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P431
[7]   Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale [J].
Farrar, JT ;
Young, JP ;
LaMoreaux, L ;
Werth, JL ;
Poole, RM .
PAIN, 2001, 94 (02) :149-158
[8]   Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release [J].
Gay, RE ;
Amadio, PC ;
Johnson, JC .
JOURNAL OF HAND SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2003, 28A (02) :250-254
[9]   VALIDITY OF THE SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE ROLAND SCALE AS A MEASURE OF DYSFUNCTION IN CHRONIC PAIN PATIENTS [J].
JENSEN, MP ;
STROM, SE ;
TURNER, JA ;
ROMANO, JM .
PAIN, 1992, 50 (02) :157-162
[10]   Pain site and the effects of amputation pain: further clarification of the meaning of mild, moderate, and severe pain [J].
Jensen, MP ;
Smith, DG ;
Ehde, DM ;
Robinsin, LR .
PAIN, 2001, 91 (03) :317-322