Dimensions of novelty:: a social representation approach to new foods

被引:103
作者
Bäckström, A
Pirttilä-Backman, AM
Tuorila, H
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Dept Food Technol, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Helsinki, Dept Social Psychol, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
new foods; social representations;
D O I
10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00005-9
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Social representations of new foods were examined with a total of 44 subjects in nine focus groups. Each group was homogenous, defined by age. gender and educational background. Halfway through the interview, commercial packages of functional, genetically modified, organic. nutritionally modified and ethnic foods were presented as visual stimuli for discussion. Thematic and content analyses of the interview data showed that five dichotomies characterized the social representation: trust/distrust, safe/unsafe, natural/artificial, pleasure/necessity, and past/present. Many metaphors were used, with functional products being associated metaphorically with, for example, medicine and genetically modified products being associated with death and terrorism. Chronological references focused on the development of cuisine. The perceived unsafety of new foods was an important argument for women but not for men. The difference between age groups was in relating the discussion to either present time (young subjects) or past time (older subjects). Level of education affected the content of argumentation. In the context of new foods, social representations are formed to cope with the feeling of strangeness evoked by the novelties. They also have a role in cultural acceptance of new products by making them familiar. Overall, the results reflect the development of a new common sense in which popularized scientific notions are anchored in the process of urbanization. (C) 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:299 / 307
页数:9
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Beardsworth AlanTeresa Keil., 1997, SOCIOLOGY MENU INVIT, V1st
[2]  
Beck Ulrich., 1992, Risk society: Towards a new modernity
[3]  
Beckmann, 1998, 55 MAPP CTR MARK SUR
[4]   Chance, risk, uncertainty and food [J].
Belton, P .
TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 12 (01) :32-35
[5]  
Billig M., 1987, ARGUING THINKING RHE
[6]  
Bloor M, 2001, FOCUS GROUPS SOCIAL
[7]  
Bourdieu Pierre, 1984, Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education
[8]   Consumers' cognitions with regard to genetically modified foods. Results of a qualitative study in four countries [J].
Bredahl, L .
APPETITE, 1999, 33 (03) :343-360
[9]   WOMEN, BUT NOT MEN, ARE WHAT THEY EAT - THE EFFECT OF MEAL SIZE AND GENDER ON PERCEIVED FEMININITY AND MASCULINITY [J].
CHAIKEN, S ;
PLINER, P .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY BULLETIN, 1987, 13 (02) :166-176
[10]  
Flick U., 1998, INTRO QUALITATIVE RE, V1st