Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years

被引:239
作者
Buist, DSM
Porter, PL
Lehman, C
Taplin, SH
White, E
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Ctr Hlth Studies, Seattle, WA 98101 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Publ Hlth & Community Med, Dept Epidemiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[6] NCI, Appl Res Program, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 2004年 / 96卷 / 19期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/djh269
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Younger women (40-49 years) have lower mammographic sensitivity (i.e., greater proportion of cancers detected after a negative mammogram) than older women (2:50 years). We explored the effect of tumor growth rate, breast density, mammographic image quality, and breast cancer risk factors on mammographic sensitivity in younger and older women. Methods: We studied 576 women (n = 73 aged 40-49 years and n = 503 aged 50 years or older) who were diagnosed with invasive breast cancer between 1988 and 1993. Interval cancers were defined as those diagnosed within 12 or 24 months after a negative screening mammogram and before a subsequent mammogram. Tumor growth rate was assessed by mitotic figure count and Ki-67 positivity. The main outcome measures were percentage of women with interval cancer (1 - mammographic sensitivity) by age, odds ratio (OR) of interval cancer by age, and excess odds (i.e., the percentage of the odds ratio for age that was explained by individual covariates). Results: Interval cancers occurred in 27.7% of younger women and 13.9% of older women within 12 months (OR = 2.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14 to 4.77) and in 52.1% of younger women and 24.7% of older women within 24 months (OR = 3.58, 95% CI = 2.15 to 5.97). Greater breast density explained 67.6% of the decreased mammographic sensitivity in younger women at 12 months, whereas rapid tumor growth explained 30.6% and breast density explained 37.6% of the decreased sensitivity in younger women at 24 months. Conclusions: Breast density largely explained decreased mammographic sensitivity at 12 months, whereas rapid tumor growth contributed to decreased mammographic sensitivity at 24 months. A 12-month versus a 24-month mammography screening interval may therefore reduce the adverse impact of faster growing tumors on mammographic sensitivity in younger women.
引用
收藏
页码:1432 / 1440
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BREAST IM REP DAT SY
[2]   Breast cancer surveillance consortium: A national mammography screening and outcomes database [J].
BallardBarbash, R ;
Taplin, SH ;
Yankaskas, BC ;
Ernster, VL ;
Rosenberg, RD ;
Carney, PA ;
Barlow, WE ;
Geller, BM ;
Kerlikowske, K ;
Edwards, BK ;
Lynch, CF ;
Urban, N ;
Key, CR ;
Poplack, SP ;
Worden, JK ;
Kessler, LG .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (04) :1001-1008
[3]  
Boyd N, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P1048
[4]   OVERWEIGHT IS RISKING FATE - DEFINITION, CLASSIFICATION, PREVALENCE, AND RISKS [J].
BRAY, GA .
ANNALS OF THE NEW YORK ACADEMY OF SCIENCES-SERIES, 1987, 499 :14-28
[5]  
Brekelmans CT, 1996, CANCER, V78, P1220, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960915)78:6<1220::AID-CNCR8>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-D
[7]   Age specific sensitivity and sojourn time in a breast cancer screening programme (DOM) in The Netherlands: A comparison of different methods [J].
Brekelmans, CTM ;
Westers, P ;
Faber, JAJ ;
Peeters, PHM ;
Collette, HJA .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 1996, 50 (01) :68-71
[8]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGIC PROFILE OF WOMEN WITH AN INTERVAL CANCER IN THE DOM SCREENING-PROGRAM [J].
BREKELMANS, CTM ;
PEETERS, PHM ;
FABER, JAJ ;
DEURENBERG, JJM ;
COLLETTE, HJA .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1994, 30 (03) :223-232
[9]   MAMMOGRAPHIC FEATURES AND BREAST-CANCER RISK - EFFECTS WITH TIME, AGE, AND MENOPAUSE STATUS [J].
BYRNE, C ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
WOLFE, J ;
PAREKH, N ;
SALANE, M ;
BRINTON, LA ;
HOOVER, R ;
HAILE, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (21) :1622-1629
[10]  
Carney PA, 2003, ANN INTERN MED, V138, P168, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-138-3-200302040-00008