Variation in patent impact by organization type: An investigation of government, university, and corporate patents

被引:11
作者
Schmid, Jon [1 ]
Fajebe, Ayodeji [2 ]
机构
[1] RAND Corp, 4570 Fifth Ave 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Sam Nunn Sch Int Affairs, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
基金
美国国家航空航天局;
关键词
innovation; general purpose technology; university; government; research agencies; patents; GENERAL-PURPOSE TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; NANOTECHNOLOGY; QUALITY; US;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scz010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article investigates whether patents assigned to different types of organizations-firms, universities, and government research agencies-vary with regards to their effect on subsequent technological change. We find the organization type to which a patent is assigned to have significant and robust effects on the number of times a patent is cited and its generality. More precisely, we find that university patents are cited more often than corporate patents and that both university and government patents are more general than corporate ones. Additionally, university and governments patents are more likely than corporate patents to be both highly cited and highly general. The finding that university patents have a particularly deep and wide impact on subsequent technological change suggests that policies that attempt to use universities as engines for advancing technological innovation may hold promise.
引用
收藏
页码:589 / 598
页数:10
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]   DIRECT VALIDATION OF CITATION COUNTS AS INDICATORS OF INDUSTRIALLY IMPORTANT PATENTS [J].
ALBERT, MB ;
AVERY, D ;
NARIN, F ;
MCALLISTER, P .
RESEARCH POLICY, 1991, 20 (03) :251-259
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, DESIGNING SOCIAL INQ
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2011, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1994, The Time to Sow and the Time to Reap: Growth Based on General Purpose Technology, DOI DOI 10.3386/W4854
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1998, ANN EC STAT, DOI DOI 10.2307/20076110
[6]   Dynamic interactions between university-industry knowledge transfer channels: A case study of the most highly cited academic patent [J].
Azagra-Caro, Joaquin M. ;
Barbera-Tomas, David ;
Edwards-Schachter, Monica ;
Tur, Elena M. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2017, 46 (02) :463-474
[7]   Knowledge diffusion from university and public research. A comparison between US, Japan and Europe using patent citations [J].
Bacchiocchi, E. ;
Montobbio, F. .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2009, 34 (02) :169-181
[8]   Can universities profit from general purpose inventions? The case of Canadian nanotechnology patents [J].
Barirani, Ahmad ;
Beaudry, Catherine ;
Agard, Bruno .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2017, 120 :271-283
[9]  
Bresnahan T, 1998, GENERAL PURPOSE TECHNOLOGIES AND ECONOMIC GROWTH, P253
[10]   GENERAL-PURPOSE TECHNOLOGIES - ENGINES OF GROWTH [J].
BRESNAHAN, TF ;
TRAJTENBERG, M .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1995, 65 (01) :83-108