Quantitative parameters for rock joint surface roughness

被引:406
作者
Belem, T [1 ]
Homand-Etienne, F [1 ]
Souley, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Ecole Natl Super Geol, Lab Environm Geomecan & Ouvrages, F-54501 Vandoeuvre Nancy, France
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s006030070001
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The morphologies of two artificial granite joints (sanded and hammered surfaces), one artificial regularly undulated joint and one natural schist joint, were studied. The sanded and hammered granite joints underwent 5 cycles of direct shear under 3 normal stress levels ranging between 0.3-4 MPa. The regularly undulated joint underwent 10 cycles of shear under 6 normal stress levels ranging between 0.5-5 MPa and the natural schist replicas underwent a monotonous shear under 5 normal stress levels ranging between 0.4-2.4 MPa. In order to characterize the morphology of the sheared joints, a laser sensor profilometer was used to perform surface data measurements prior to and after each shear test. Rather than describing the morphology of the joints from the single profiles, our characterization is based on a simultaneous analysis of all the surface profiles. Roughness was viewed as a combination of a primary roughness and a secondary roughness. The surface angularity was quantified by defining its three-dimensional mean angle, theta(s), and the parameter Z2(s). The surface anisotropy and the secondary roughness were respectively quantified by the degree of apparent anisotropy, k(a), and the surface relative roughness coefficient, R-s. The surface sinuosity was quantified by the surface tortuosity coefficient, T-s. Comparison between the means of the classical linear parameters and those proposed shows that linear parameters underestimate the morphological characteristics of the joint surfaces. As a result, the proposed bi-dimensional and tri-dimensional parameters better describe the evolution of the joints initial roughness during the course of shearing.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 242
页数:26
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], P INT C MECH JOINT F
[2]   The anisotropy of surface morphology characteristics of rock discontinuities [J].
Aydan, O ;
Shimizu, Y ;
Kawamoto, T .
ROCK MECHANICS AND ROCK ENGINEERING, 1996, 29 (01) :47-59
[3]  
BELEM T, 1997, THESIS INPL NANCY
[4]  
BELEM T, 1997, INT J ROCK MECH MIN, V34
[5]   CLOSURE OF RANDOM ELASTIC SURFACES IN CONTACT [J].
BROWN, SR ;
SCHOLZ, CH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SOLID EARTH AND PLANETS, 1985, 90 (NB7) :5531-5545
[6]   PROFILOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF FRACTURES [J].
ELSOUDANI, SM .
METALLOGRAPHY, 1978, 11 (03) :247-336
[7]   ANISOTROPY IN PORE NETWORKS ANALYZED WITH 2-D AUTOCORRELATION (VARIOMAPS) [J].
FRYKMAN, P ;
ROGON, TA .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 1993, 19 (07) :887-930
[8]  
HOMANDETINENNE F, 1995, P 7 INT C APPL STAT, P1229
[9]   AN EXPERIMENTAL-STUDY ON THE ANISOTROPY AND STRESS-DEPENDENCY OF THE STRENGTH AND DEFORMABILITY OF ROCK JOINTS [J].
JING, L ;
NORDLUND, E ;
STEPHANSSON, O .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ROCK MECHANICS AND MINING SCIENCES & GEOMECHANICS ABSTRACTS, 1992, 29 (06) :535-542
[10]  
JOURNEL A, 1975, GEOSTATISTIQUE MINIE