Guidelines for back pain - Evidence-based guidelines from the German Society of General Practice and Family Medicine

被引:13
作者
Becker, A
Chenot, JF
Niebling, W
Kochen, MM
机构
[1] Univ Gottingen, Abt Allgemeinmed, D-3400 Gottingen, Germany
[2] Univ Freiburg, Lehrbereich Allgemeinmed, Freiburg, Germany
来源
ZEITSCHRIFT FUR ORTHOPADIE UND IHRE GRENZGEBIETE | 2004年 / 142卷 / 06期
关键词
guidelines; back pain; low back pain;
D O I
10.1055/s-2004-832488
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Chronic back pain is one of our society's most important health problems, causing long periods of sick leave and early retirements. Recently the German Society of General Practice and Family Medicine (DEGAM) published an evidence-based guideline for low back pain. It has been developed according to the 10-step concept of guideline development of the DEGAM, aiming for early detection of complicated clinical conditions, avoidance of unnecessary diagnostic tests and prevention of chronicity. Complicated, uncomplicated and radicular pain are defined by patient history and a short clinical examination. Imaging and further diagnostic tests are reserved for patients at risk. Basic therapy consists of structured advice. The aim of the guideline is to get patients back to their usual activity supported by effective pain relief. Psychosocial factors which are important for the prognosis should be evaluated already during the first consultation. Manual therapy might help in acute pain. Patients with persistent pain symptoms and long periods of sick leave should be transferred to multiprofessional management including pain treatment, behavioural therapy and physiotherapy. A randomised controlled trial has been set up to study the efficacy of guideline implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 719
页数:4
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]
Lack of evidence-based research for idiopathic low back pain -: The importance of a specific diagnosis [J].
Abraham, I ;
Killackey-Jones, B .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 162 (13) :1442-1444
[2]
Becker A, 2003, Z ALLG MED, V79, P126
[3]
BEWIG A, 2001, Z ALLG MED, V77, P31
[4]
GERLACH FM, 1999, KONAEPT ENTWICKLUNG
[5]
Are selective COX 2 hihibitors superior to traditional non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs?: Adequate analysis of the CLASS trial indicates that this may not be the case [J].
Jüni, P ;
Rutjes, AWS ;
Dieppe, PA .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7349) :1287-1288
[6]
Radiography of the lumbar spine in primary care patients with low back pain: randomised controlled trial [J].
Kendrick, D ;
Fielding, K ;
Bentley, E ;
Kerslake, R ;
Miller, P ;
Pringle, M .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 322 (7283) :400-405
[7]
Spinal manipulation for low back pain - An updated systematic review of randomized clinical trials [J].
Koes, BW ;
Assendelft, WJJ ;
vanderHeijden, GJMG ;
Bouter, LM .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (24) :2860-2871
[8]
Treatment of chronic low back pain through intensive activation - An assessment of 10 years. [J].
Pfingsten, M ;
Hildebrandt, J .
ANASTHESIOLOGIE INTENSIVMEDIZIN NOTFALLMEDIZIN SCHMERZTHERAPIE, 2001, 36 (09) :580-589
[9]
REICHENBACH S, 2003, Z ALLG MED, V79, P288
[10]
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain [J].
Roclofs, P. D. D. M. ;
Deyo, R. A. .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2008, (01)