Missing data: Prevalence and reporting practices

被引:25
作者
Bodner, Todd E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Portland State Univ, Dept Psychol, Portland, OR 97207 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2466/PR0.99.3.675-680
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Results are described for a survey assessing prevalence of missing data and reporting practices in studies with missing data in a random sample of empirical research journal articles from the PsychINFO database for the year 1999, two years prior to the publication of a special section on missing data in Psychological Methods. Analysis indicates missing data problems were found in about one-third of the studies. Further, analytical methods and reporting practices varied widely for studies with missing data. One may consider these results as baseline data to assess progress as reporting standards evolve for studies with missing data. Some potential reporting standards are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:675 / 680
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Allison PD, 2010, HANDBOOK OF SURVEY RESEARCH, 2ND EDITION, P631
[2]  
APA, 2001, Publication manual of the American Psychological Association, V5th, DOI DOI 10.1037/0000165-000
[3]  
DEMPSTER AP, 1977, J ROYAL STAT SOC B, V39, P349
[4]   Editors can lead researchers to confidence intervals, but can't make them think - Statistical reform lessons from medicine [J].
Fidler, F ;
Thomason, N ;
Cumming, G ;
Finch, S ;
Leeman, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (02) :119-126
[5]  
Little R.J., 1987, Statistical Analysis With Missing Data
[6]  
Little R.J.A., 2002, STAT ANAL MISSING DA, DOI DOI 10.1002/9781119013563
[7]  
Longford NT, 2005, STAT SOC SCI PUBL P, P3
[8]  
Schafer J.L, 1997, ANAL INCOMPLETE MULT
[9]   New approaches to missing data in psychological research: Introduction to the special section [J].
West, SG .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2001, 6 (04) :315-316
[10]   Statistical methods in psychology journals -: Guidelines and explanations [J].
Wilkinson, L .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1999, 54 (08) :594-604