Impact of renal artery multiplicity on outcomes of renal donors and recipients in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

被引:96
作者
Hsu, THS
Su, LM
Ratner, LE
Trock, BJ
Kavoussi, LR
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bayview Med Ctr, James Buchanan Brady Urol Inst, Baltimore, MD 21224 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02124-6
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To review our laparoscopic donor nephrectomy experience to determine the impact of multiple renal arteries on renal donor and recipient outcomes. Multiple renal arteries can present a challenge during live laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Methods. During a 6-year period, 353 patients underwent laparoscopic donor nephrectomy and an equal number of patients underwent living-related renal transplantation. A retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the renal donors and recipients associated with the laparoscopic procedure Results. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomies were associated with one renal artery in 277 cases (78.5%), two renal arteries in 71 cases (20.1%), and three renal arteries in 5 cases (1.4%). A left-sided procedure was most commonly performed in all three groups. The operative and renal allograft warm ischemia times increased with the number of renal arteries, but the differences were not statistically significant. The renal artery anatomy did not have a significant association with intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or complication rate in the donor group. Regarding the transplant recipients, renal artery multiplicity had no significant association with the complication rate, 1-year graft survival, or creatinine clearance levels at 1, 2, or 3 days or at 3, 6, or 12 months postoperatively. Conclusions. With meticulous procurement and reconstructive transplantation techniques, the presence of multiple renal arteries in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy does not have a significant impact on the outcomes of the renal donors or recipients.
引用
收藏
页码:323 / 327
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the conventional open approach [J].
Brown, SL ;
Biehl, TR ;
Rawlins, MC ;
Hefty, TR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 165 (03) :766-769
[2]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy [J].
Fabrizio, MD ;
Ratner, LE ;
Montgomery, RA ;
Kavoussi, LR .
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 1999, 26 (01) :247-+
[3]  
Fabrizio MD, 1999, UROLOGY, V53, P665
[4]   Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy [J].
Flowers, JL ;
Jacobs, S ;
Cho, E ;
Morton, A ;
Rosenberger, WF ;
Evans, D ;
Imbembo, AL ;
Bartlett, ST .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1997, 226 (04) :483-489
[5]  
Goldfarb D A, 2001, J Urol, V166, P2558, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)65635-2
[6]  
Hawasli A, 2001, AM SURGEON, V67, P342
[7]  
Jacobs SC, 2000, J UROLOGY, V164, P1494, DOI 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)67014-0
[8]   Laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy and multiple renal arteries [J].
Kuo, PC ;
Cho, ES ;
Flowers, JL ;
Jacobs, S ;
Bartlett, ST ;
Johnson, LB .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 176 (06) :559-562
[9]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Outcomes equivalent to open surgery [J].
Lee, BR ;
Chow, GK ;
Ratner, LE ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2000, 14 (10) :811-819
[10]   Laparoscopic live donor nephrectoriy - Is it safe? Analysis of 80 consecutive cases and comparison with open nephrectomy [J].
Leventhal, JR ;
Deeik, RK ;
Joehl, RJ ;
Rege, RV ;
Herman, CH ;
Fryer, JP ;
Kaufman, D ;
Abecassis, M ;
Stuart, FP .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2000, 70 (04) :602-606