The cost-effectiveness of acetaminophen, NSAIDs, and selective COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of symptomatic knee osteoarthritis

被引:43
作者
Kamath, CC [1 ]
Kremers, HM [1 ]
Vanness, DJ [1 ]
O'Fallon, WM [1 ]
Cabanela, RL [1 ]
Gabriel, SE [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
acetaminophen; cost-effectiveness; knee osteoarthritis; NSAIDs; selective COX-2 inhibitors;
D O I
10.1046/j.1524-4733.2003.00215.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to conduct an economic evaluation of rofecoxib and celecoxib compared with high-dose acetaminophen or ibuprofen with and without misoprostol for patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: A decision analysis model was designed over 6 months using two measures of effectiveness: 1) number of upper gastrointestinal (GI) adverse events averted; and 2) number of patients who achieved perceptible pain relief. Separate analyses were conducted for all patients and for those who did not respond to acetaminophen. Outcome probabilities were obtained from a comprehensive review of randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Costs were derived from actual resource utilization of OA patients. Results: In terms of averting GI events, acetaminophen dominates the other options for an average risk patient population. For patients who did not respond to acetaminophen, rofecoxib had the lowest incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per GI event avoided ($32,000) relative to ibuprofen. In terms of pain control, ibuprofen had an ICER of $610.77 per additional patient achieving minimal perceptible clinical improvement (MPCI) relative to acetaminophen, while rofecoxib had an ICER of $12,000 relative to ibuprofen. For patients who did not respond to acetaminophen and who are at high risk of developing an adverse GI event, rofecoxib dominates ibuprofen as the preferred alternative for both measures of effectiveness. One-way, two-way, and probabilistic sensitivity analyses established that these results were generally robust. Conclusions: Our results suggest that for average-risk knee OA patients, acetaminophen dominates the other therapies in terms of cost per GI event averted. In terms of pain relief, cost-effectiveness acceptability curves indicate that if one values pain relief below $275 per patient achieving MPCI, acetaminophen is the therapy most likely to be optimal; between $275 and $14,150, ibuprofen is most likely to be optimal; and above $14,150, rofecoxib is most likely to be optimal.
引用
收藏
页码:144 / 157
页数:14
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
Altman RD, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM-US, V43, P1905
[2]   Comparative safety evaluation of non-narcotic analgesics [J].
Andrade, SE ;
Martinez, C ;
Walker, AM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1998, 51 (12) :1357-1365
[3]   Treatment of osteoarthritis with celecoxib, a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bensen, WG ;
Fiechtner, JJ ;
McMillen, JI ;
Zhao, WW ;
Yu, SS ;
Woods, EM ;
Hubbard, RC ;
Isakson, PC ;
Verburg, KM ;
Geis, GS .
MAYO CLINIC PROCEEDINGS, 1999, 74 (11) :1095-1105
[4]  
Bombardier C, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V43, pS225
[5]   Comparison of upper gastrointestinal toxicity of rofecoxib and naproxen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. [J].
Bombardier, C ;
Laine, L ;
Reicin, A ;
Shapiro, D ;
Burgos-Vargas, R ;
Davis, B ;
Day, R ;
Ferraz, MB ;
Hawkey, CJ ;
Hochberg, MC ;
Kvien, TK ;
Schnitzer, TJ ;
Weaver, A .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2000, 343 (21) :1520-1528
[6]   COMPARISON OF AN ANTIINFLAMMATORY DOSE OF IBUPROFEN, AN ANALGESIC DOSE OF IBUPROFEN, AND ACETAMINOPHEN IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE [J].
BRADLEY, JD ;
BRANDT, KD ;
KATZ, BP ;
KALASINSKI, LA ;
RYAN, SI .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1991, 325 (02) :87-91
[7]   Handling uncertainty in cost-effectiveness models [J].
Briggs, AH .
PHARMACOECONOMICS, 2000, 17 (05) :479-500
[8]   Eradication of Helicobacter pylori and risk of peptic ulcers in patients starting long-term treatment with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs:: a randomised trial [J].
Chan, FKL ;
To, KF ;
Wu, JCY ;
Yung, MY ;
Leung, WK ;
Kwok, T ;
Hui, Y ;
Chan, HLY ;
Chan, CSY ;
Hui, E ;
Woo, J ;
Sung, JJY .
LANCET, 2002, 359 (9300) :9-13
[9]  
Chan WC, 2001, HEMATOL ONCOL, V19, P1
[10]  
Choi HK, 2000, ARTHRITIS RHEUM, V43, P2316, DOI 10.1002/1529-0131(200010)43:10<2316::AID-ANR20>3.0.CO