Randomised long-term comparison of tinzaparin and dalteparin in haemodialysis

被引:15
作者
Beijering, RJR
ten Cate, H
Stevens, P
Vanholder, R
Van Dorp, WT
van Olden, RW
Wickström, B
Sprogel, P
ten Catel, JW
机构
[1] LEO Pharma, Dept Med, DK-2750 Ballerup, Denmark
[2] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Vasc Med, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Nephrol, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Dept Nephrol, Ghent, Belgium
[5] Dept Nephrol, Haarlem, Netherlands
[6] Dept Nephrol, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00044011-200323020-00002
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective and design: Tinzaparin and dalteparin are low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) with different pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles that may lead to differences in efficacy and safety. In a long-term, multicentre, prospective. randomised trial we compared the efficacy and safety profiles of tinzaparin and dalteparin (starting doses were adjusted to comparable anti-IIa activity). The sample size was calculated to show a relative difference of 50% in unsatisfactory dialyses with a power of 80% (to prove superiority). Patients: 159 patients undergoing chronic intermittent haemodialysis were included in the study, Main outcome measures: Efficacy was assessed by scoring the dialyser (from 1 = good, clear dialyser to 4 = total clotting of the dialyser requiring a change of the extracorporeal circuit) and bubble catcher (from I = no clots to 4 = severe clotting) after each dialysis. Levels of thrombin antithrombin complexes (TAT) were also determined. Safety was assessed by noting all minor and major bleeding. Results: The mean anticoagulant dose for tinzaparin during the maintenance phase was about 10% lower than that of dalteparin: 5024 +/- 2321 (range 70012000) anti-Xa IU and 5546 +/- 2395 (1875-12913) anti-Xa IU, respectively, No difference was found between treatments in clotting for either the dialyser or the bubble catcher (p = 0.59). TAT levels showed no difference between tinzaparin and dalteparin. The number of minor bleeds did not differ between treatments: 1.5% (40/2629 dialyses) for tinzaparin and 1.4% (41/2863 dialyses) for dalteparin, and one major bleed occurred in each treatment arm. Conclusions: Dose calculation of tinzaparin and dalteparin according to anti-IIa activity resulted in equivalent efficacy and safety, although this was achieved with a 10% lower dose of tinzaparin measured in anti-Xa IU. Both LMWHs can be safely administered over a wide dosage range in patients undergoing long-term intermittent haemodialysis.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 97
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
ADNITT P, 289 IN
[2]  
ANDRASSY K, 1996, THROMB RES, V81, P29
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, SAS STAT US GUID VER
[4]  
ARMITAGE P, 1989, STAT METHODS MED RES
[5]   Activation of coagulation during treatment with haemodialysis [J].
Bartels, PCM ;
Schoorl, M ;
Schoorl, M ;
Wiering, JGA ;
Nubé, MJ .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2000, 60 (04) :283-290
[6]   Anticoagulants and extracorporeal circuits [J].
Beijering, RJR ;
ten Cate, H ;
Nurmohamed, MT ;
ten Cate, JW .
SEMINARS IN THROMBOSIS AND HEMOSTASIS, 1997, 23 (02) :225-233
[7]  
BEIJERING RJR, 1997, THROMB HAEMOST SPS, V1176, P287
[8]   Low molecular weight heparins [J].
Bergqvist, D .
JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 240 (02) :63-72
[9]  
Boneu B, 2000, THROMB RES, V100, pV113
[10]  
Brieger D, 1997, THROMB HAEMOSTASIS, V77, P317