Reconfiguring an irrigation landscape to improve provision of ecosystem services

被引:42
作者
Crossman, Neville D. [1 ]
Connor, Jeffrey D. [1 ]
Bryan, Brett A. [1 ]
Summers, David M. [1 ]
Ginnivan, John [2 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Sustainable Ecosyst, Policy & Econ Res Unit, Urrbrae, SA, Australia
[2] Goulburn Murray Water, Tatura, Vic, Australia
关键词
Landscape planning; Geographic information systems; Cost-benefit analysis; Irrigation; Climate change; Water management; Spatial targeting; Environmental valuation; HABITAT CREATION; WATER; BENEFITS; WETLANDS; COSTS; RIVER; AMENITIES; VALUATION; IMPACTS; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.11.020
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Over-allocation of fresh water resources to consumptive uses, coupled with recurring drought and the prospect of climate change, is compromising the stocks of natural capital in the world's basins and reducing their ability to provide water-dependent ecosystem services To combat this. governments worldwide are making significant investment in efforts to improve the sharing of water between consumptive uses and the environment. Many investments are centred on the modernisation of inefficient irrigation delivery systems and the purchase of consumptive water for environmental flows In this study, we applied spatial targeting within a cost-benefit framework to reconfigure agricultural land use in an irrigation district to achieve a 20% reduction in agricultural water use to increase environmental flows, and improve the provision of other ecosystem services. We demonstrate a targeted land use reconfiguration policy approach using spatial planning and optimisation models Our model estimates a potential increase in the net present value of ecosystem services of up to SA 347 million. The increase in ecosystem services include recovering 62 GL of water for environmental flows, the sequestration of 10.6 million tonnes of CO2e/year, a 12 EC (mu S/cm) reduction in river salinity, and an overall 9% increase in the value of agriculture. Without a spatially targeted approach to planning, a 20% reduction in water for irrigation could result in the loss of SA 68 7 million in economic returns to agriculture which may be only marginally offset by the increased value of ecosystem services resulting from the return of 62 GL of water to the environment. Crown Copyright (C) 2009 Published by Elsevier BM. All rights reserved
引用
收藏
页码:1031 / 1042
页数:12
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], WAT AV MURR REP AUST
  • [2] [Anonymous], AUSTR CENS POP HOUS
  • [3] [Anonymous], ANAL EC POTENTIAL FO
  • [4] [Anonymous], ANUCLIM USERS GUIDE
  • [5] *AUST GOV, 2008, CARB POLL RED SCHEM
  • [6] *AUST GOV, 2008, AGR MURR DARL BAS RE
  • [7] *AUSTR BUR STAT, 2007, AGR COMM SMALL AR DA
  • [8] Targeting tools for the purchase of environmental amenities
    Babcock, BA
    Lakshminarayan, PG
    Wu, JJ
    Zilberman, D
    [J]. LAND ECONOMICS, 1997, 73 (03) : 325 - 339
  • [9] Maximising the natural capital benefits of habitat creation: Spatially targeting native woodland using GIS
    Bailey, N
    Lee, JT
    Thompson, S
    [J]. LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2006, 75 (3-4) : 227 - 243
  • [10] Analysing the agricultural costs and non-market benefits of implementing the Water Framework Directive
    Bateman, Ian J.
    Brouwer, Roy
    Davies, Helen
    Day, Brett H.
    Deflandre, Amelie
    Di Falco, Salvatore
    Georgiou, Stavros
    Hadley, David
    Hutchins, Michael
    Jones, Andrew P.
    Kay, David
    Leeks, Graham
    Lewis, Mervyn
    Lovett, Andrew A.
    Neal, Colin
    Posen, Paulette
    Rigby, Dan
    Turner, R. Kerry
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2006, 57 (02) : 221 - 237