A comparative efficacy trial in Germany in infants who received either the Lederle/Takeda acellular pertussis component DTP (DTaP) vaccine, the Lederle whole-cell component DTP vaccine, or DT vaccine

被引:165
作者
Stehr, K
Cherry, JD
Heininger, U
Schmitt-Grohe, S
Uberall, M
Laussucq, S
Eckhardt, T
Meyer, M
Engelhardt, R
Christenson, P
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Div Pediat Infect Dis, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Ctr Vaccine Res, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Klin Poliklin Kinder & Jugendliche, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[4] Wyeth Lederle Vaccines & Pediat, Pearl River, NY USA
[5] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Inst Med Stat, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[6] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Biomath, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
关键词
acellular pertussis vaccine; whole-cell pertussis vaccine; double blind; B pertussis; B parapertussis;
D O I
10.1542/peds.101.1.1
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background. The goal of the trial was to determine the efficacy of a multicomponent acellular pertussis vaccine against Bordetella illnesses in comparison with a whole-cell product and DT. Design. In a randomized, double-blind fashion, 2- to 4-month-old infants received 4 doses of either DTP or DTaP vaccine at 3, 4.5, 6, and 15 to 18 months of age. The controls received 3 doses (3, 4.5, 15 to 18 months of age) of DT vaccine. The DTP vaccine was Lederle adsorbed vaccine (licensed in the United States) and DTaP was Lederle/Takeda adsorbed vaccine. Follow-up for vaccine efficacy started 2 weeks after the third dose (DTP/DTaP) and at the same age (6.5 months) in DT recipients. Reactogenicity of all doses of all three vaccines was documented by standardized parent diary cards. In addition, all subjects were monitored for respiratory illnesses and serious adverse events by biweekly phone calls. Results. From May 1991 to January 1993, a total of 10 271 infants were enrolled: 8532 received either DTP or DTaP and 1739 received DT. Specific efficacy against B pertussis infections with cough greater than or equal to 7 days duration was 83% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 76-88) and 72% (95% CI: 62-79) for DTP and DTaP, respectively; results for DTP and DTaP based on greater than or equal to 21 days of cough with either paroxysms, whoop or posttussive vomiting (PWV) were 93% (95% CI: 89-96) and 83% (95% CI: 76-88), respectively. For DTaP vaccine, efficacy was higher after the fourth dose as compared with its efficacy after the third dose (78% vs 62% for cough greater than or equal to 7 days and 85% vs 76% for cough;greater than or equal to 21 days with PWV). For DTP vaccine, efficacy was less varied after the third and fourth dose (78% vs 85% for cough greater than or equal to 7 days and 93% vs 93% for cough greater than or equal to 21 days with PWV). In contrast with DTP, the DTaP vaccine had some efficacy against B parapertussis infection (point estimate for cough greater than or equal to 7 days: 31% [95% CI: -10-56]). All vaccines were generally well-tolerated. However, side reactions were significantly less after DTaP compared with DTP. Conclusions. Like other multicomponent acellular pertussis vaccines, the Lederle/Takeda DTaP vaccine demonstrated good efficacy against mild and typical pertussis due to B pertussis infections. Interestingly, it also :may have some efficacy against B parapertussis. Based on the results of this trial, the vaccine was licensed in the United States in December 1996 for all 5 doses of the currently recommended immunization schedule in this country.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 11
页数:11
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   CLINICAL AND SEROLOGIC RESPONSES TO ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS-VACCINE IN INFANTS AND YOUNG-CHILDREN [J].
ANDERSON, EL ;
BELSHE, RB ;
BARTRAM, J ;
GURWITH, M ;
HUNG, P ;
LEVNER, M ;
VERNON, SK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1987, 141 (09) :949-953
[2]   DIFFERENCES IN REACTOGENICITY AND ANTIGENICITY OF ACELLULAR AND STANDARD PERTUSSIS VACCINES COMBINED WITH DIPHTHERIA AND TETANUS IN INFANTS [J].
ANDERSON, EL ;
BELSHE, RB ;
BARTRAM, J .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1988, 157 (04) :731-737
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1997, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V46, P1
[4]   ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS VACCINES - EFFICACY AND EVALUATION OF CLINICAL CASE DEFINITIONS [J].
BLACKWELDER, WC ;
STORSAETER, J ;
OLIN, P ;
HALLANDER, HO .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF DISEASES OF CHILDREN, 1991, 145 (11) :1285-1289
[5]   COMPARISON OF ACELLULAR AND WHOLE-CELL PERTUSSIS-COMPONENT DIPHTHERIA-TETANUS-PERTUSSIS VACCINES IN INFANTS [J].
BLUMBERG, DA ;
MINK, CM ;
CHERRY, JD ;
JOHNSON, C ;
GARBER, R ;
PLOTKIN, SA ;
WATSON, B ;
BALLANCO, GA ;
DAUM, RS ;
SULLIVAN, B ;
TOWNSEND, TR ;
BRAYTON, J ;
GOOCH, WM ;
NELSON, DB ;
CONGENI, BL ;
PROBER, CG ;
HACKELL, JG ;
DEKKER, CL ;
CHRISTENSON, PD .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1991, 119 (02) :194-204
[6]   COMPARISON OF AN ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS-COMPONENT DIPHTHERIA-TETANUS-PERTUSSIS (DTP) VACCINE WITH A WHOLE-CELL PERTUSSIS-COMPONENT DTP VACCINE IN 17-MONTH-OLD TO 24-MONTH-OLD CHILDREN, WITH MEASUREMENT OF 69-KILODALTON OUTER-MEMBRANE PROTEIN ANTIBODY [J].
BLUMBERG, DA ;
MINK, CM ;
CHERRY, JD ;
REISINGER, KS ;
BLATTER, MM ;
CONGENI, BL ;
DEKKER, CL ;
STOUT, MG ;
MEZZATESTA, JR ;
SCOTT, JV ;
CHRISTENSON, PD .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 1990, 117 (01) :46-51
[7]   REACTOGENICITY AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF A DOUBLE-STRENGTH ACELLULAR PERTUSSIS-VACCINE [J].
BLUMBERG, DA ;
CHATFIELD, PC ;
CHERRY, JD ;
ROBINSON, RG ;
SMITH, K ;
MABIE, L ;
HOLROYD, HJ ;
BAKER, LR ;
DUDENHOEFFER, FE ;
APAU, N ;
HACKELL, JG ;
CAWEIN, A .
VACCINE, 1992, 10 (09) :614-616
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1992, MMWR Recomm Rep, V41, P1
[9]  
CHERRY JD, 1991, DEV BIOLOGICALS, V73, P51
[10]  
CHERRY JD, 1994, 103 ROSS C PED RES S, V13, P218