Methyldibromo glutaronitrile:: clinical experience and exposure-based risk assessment

被引:28
作者
Zachariae, C [1 ]
Rastogi, S
Devantier, C
Menné, T
Johansen, JD
机构
[1] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, Dept Dermatol, Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Natl Environm Res Inst, Dept Atmospher Environm, Roskilde, Denmark
[3] Odense Univ Hosp, Dept Dermatol, DK-5000 Odense, Denmark
[4] Univ Copenhagen, Gentofte Hosp, Natl Allergy Res Ctr, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
contact allergy; exposure assessment; hand eczema; methyldibromo glutaronitrile; risk assessment;
D O I
10.1034/j.1600-0536.2003.00076.x
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
In the year 2000, the level of methyldibromo glutaronitrile (MDGN) allergy in dermatology clinics in Europe exceeded the level of allergies to all other preservatives, with a prevalence of 3.5%. In the present study, cases of primary sensitization and elicitation to MDGN due to cosmetic products were collected over an 8-month period at the Department of Dermatology, Gentofte University Hospital. The aim was to identify the products related to hand eczema, assess exposure to MDGN in these products and relate the findings to results from a newly developed updated risk assessment model for contact allergy. Out of 24 patients with a positive patch test to MDGN, 17 patients with hand eczema were identified. In 11 of these patients, cosmetic products used in relation to the onset of the disease were shown to contain MDGN (65%). In 8 of these 11 cases, primary sensitization was probable, 5 due to hand/body lotions and 3 due to lotions and/or liquid hand soap. Chemical analysis of 12 products showed that lotions contained 149-390 ppm of MDGN, liquid hand soap 144-399 ppm, a rinsing cream 293 ppm and shampoos 78-79 ppm. The shampoo exposure was not of certain relevance to the eczema. Applying the newly developed updated risk assessment model showed that the concentrations of MDGN in lotions of 149-390 ppm exceeded the calculated maximum acceptable exposure level for MDGN, which would be expected to lead to sensitization in consumers using such products, as seen in the current study. The present cases and updated exposure-based risk assessment process add to the evidence and need for re-defining safe-use concentrations of MDGN in cosmetic products.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 154
页数:5
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Methyldibromoglutaronitrile is an important contact allergen in The Netherlands [J].
deGroot, AC ;
deCock, PAJJM ;
Coenraads, PJ ;
vanGinkel, CJW ;
Jagtman, BA ;
vanJoost, T ;
vanderKley, AMJ ;
Meinardi, MMHM ;
Smeenk, G ;
vanderValk, PGM ;
vanderWalle, HB ;
Weyland, JW .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1996, 34 (02) :118-120
[2]   Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (Euxyl K 400): An important ''new'' allergen in cosmetics [J].
DeGroot, AC ;
vanGinkel, CJW ;
Weijland, JW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 35 (05) :743-747
[3]  
Gerberick G F, 2001, Am J Contact Dermat, V12, P156, DOI 10.1053/ajcd.2001.23926
[4]  
Gruvberger B, 1998, ACTA DERM-VENEREOL, V78, P52
[5]   Methyldibromoglutaronitrile (Euxyl K400): A new and important sensitizer in the United States? [J].
Jackson, JM ;
Fowler, JF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 1998, 38 (06) :934-937
[6]   Contact allergy to methyldibromo glutaronitrile in Euxyl® K 400 in a cosmetic cream for protection against a permanent wave solution [J].
Kelterer, D ;
Kaatz, M ;
Bauer, HI ;
Thiele, J ;
Elsner, P .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2002, 46 (04) :250-250
[7]   CONTACT-DERMATITIS TO A NEW BIOCIDE (TEKTAMER-38) USED IN A PASTE GLUE FORMULATION [J].
MATHIAS, CGT .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 1983, 9 (05) :418-418
[8]  
McFadden JP, 2000, CONTACT DERMATITIS, V42, P54
[9]   COMPARISON OF HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID-CHROMATOGRAPHIC METHODS FOR THE DETERMINATION OF 1,2-DIBROMO-2,4-DICYANOBUTANE IN COSMETIC PRODUCTS [J].
RASTOGI, SC ;
JOHANSEN, SS .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1995, 692 (1-2) :53-57
[10]   Analytical control of preservative labelling on skin creams [J].
Rastogi, SC .
CONTACT DERMATITIS, 2000, 43 (06) :339-343