In situ endoluminal brushing: a safe technique for the diagnosis of catheter-related bloodstream infection

被引:16
作者
Dobbins, BM
Kite, P
Catton, JA
Wilcox, MH
McMahon, MJ
机构
[1] Gen Infirm, Old Med Sch, Dept Microbiol, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Univ Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[3] Gen Infirm, Old Med Sch, Acad Surg Unit, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Leeds, Leeds LS1 3EX, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
catheter; bacteraemia; diagnosis; adverse event;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhin.2004.06.025
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
We assessed the safety of the endoluminal brush technique for the in situ diagnosis of central-venous-catheter (CVC)-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). The endoluminal brush was used to investigate patients with suspected CRBSI by sampling the CVC Lumen to within 3-5 cm of the catheter tip (the brush was kinked to mark the length required). Quantitative peripheral blood cultures were taken 1 min pre-brushing and 1 min and 1 h post-brushing. In addition, a 1 mL sample of through-catheter blood was aspirated immediately pre- and post-brushing, and aliquots were directly plated on to blood agar to determine the load of CVC-associated bacteria. After CVC removal, catheter tips were sent for culture using the Maki roll. and modified Cleri flush techniques. Of 139 suspected cases, 61 (45%) had confirmed episodes of CRBSI. No patients experienced fever or rigors, or had evidence of embolic phenomena after CVC endoluminal brushing. There was no difference overall in pre-brushing and 1 min post-brushing peripheral blood bacterial counts (P < 0.702). Peripheral and CVC blood bacterial counts were significantly reduced 1 h post-brushing (P < 0.03 and P < 0.001, respectively), possibly due to removal of endoluminal biomass. The endoluminal brush technique can be safety used to diagnose CRBSI without the need for CVC removal, provided that the brush is not allowed to protrude beyond the tip of the catheter. (C) 2004 The Hospital Infection Society. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 237
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
BJORNSON HS, 1982, SURGERY, V92, P720
[2]   Diagnosis of catheter-related bacteraemia: a prospective comparison of the time to positivity of hub-blood versus peripheral-blood cultures [J].
Blot, F ;
Nitenberg, G ;
Chachaty, E ;
Raynard, B ;
Germann, N ;
Antoun, S ;
Laplanche, A ;
Brun-Buisson, C ;
Tancrede, C .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9184) :1071-1077
[3]   QUANTITATIVE CULTURE OF INTRAVENOUS CATHETERS AND OTHER INTRAVASCULAR INSERTS [J].
CLERI, DJ ;
CORRADO, ML ;
SELIGMAN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1980, 141 (06) :781-787
[4]   Central venous catheter replacement strategies: A systematic review of the literature [J].
Cook, D ;
Randolph, A ;
Kernerman, P ;
Cupido, C ;
King, D ;
Soukup, C ;
BrunBuisson, C .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1997, 25 (08) :1417-1424
[5]   Diagnosis of central venous catheter related sepsis - a critical look inside [J].
Dobbins, BM ;
Kite, P ;
Wilcox, MH .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 52 (03) :165-172
[6]   TRIPLE-LUMEN VS SINGLE-LUMEN CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETERS - A PROSPECTIVE-STUDY IN A CRITICALLY ILL POPULATION [J].
GIL, RT ;
KRUSE, JA ;
THILLBAHAROZIAN, MC ;
CARLSON, RW .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1989, 149 (05) :1139-1143
[7]   Evaluation of a novel endoluminal brush method for in situ diagnosis of catheter related sepsis [J].
Kite, P ;
Dobbins, BM ;
Wilcox, MH ;
Fawley, WN ;
Kindon, AJL ;
Thomas, D ;
Tighe, MJ ;
McMahon, MJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 1997, 50 (04) :278-282
[8]   Rapid diagnosis of central-venous-catheter-related bloodstream infection without catheter removal [J].
Kite, P ;
Dobbins, BM ;
Wilcox, MH ;
McMahon, MJ .
LANCET, 1999, 354 (9189) :1504-1507
[9]   SEMIQUANTITATIVE CULTURE METHOD FOR IDENTIFYING INTRAVENOUS-CATHETER-RELATED INFECTION [J].
MAKI, DG ;
WEISE, CE ;
SARAFIN, HW .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1977, 296 (23) :1305-1309
[10]  
MARCUS S, 1989, INFECT SURG, V8, P157