Limits to health care: Fair procedures, democratic deliberation, and the legitimacy problem for insurers

被引:389
作者
Daniels, N [1 ]
Sabin, J
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, Medford, MA 02155 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Eth Managed Care, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00082.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
[No abstract available]
引用
收藏
页码:303 / 350
页数:48
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, BENCHMARKS FAIRNESS
[2]  
ARROW KJ, 1963, AM ECON REV, V53, P941
[3]  
Benhabib Seyla., 1996, DEMOCRACY DIFFERENCE, P95
[4]   RETRACTED: HIGH-DOSE CHEMOTHERAPY WITH HEMATOPOIETIC RESCUE AS PRIMARY-TREATMENT FOR METASTATIC BREAST-CANCER - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL (Retracted article. See vol. 19, pg. 2973, 2001) [J].
BEZWODA, WR ;
SEYMOUR, L ;
DANSEY, RD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (10) :2483-2489
[5]  
CALABRESE G, 1978, TRAGIC CHOICES
[6]  
COHEN J, 1996, UNPUB DELIBERATIVE D
[7]  
Cohen Joshua, 1994, Chicago-Kent Law Review, V69, P589
[8]  
COHNE J, IN PRESS EUROPEAN LA
[9]   Justice, fair procedures, and the goals of medicine [J].
Daniels, N .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1996, 26 (06) :10-12
[10]  
DANIELS N, 1991, HASTINGS CENT REP, V21, P37