Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion determined by homeostasis model assessment and risk of diabetes in a multiethnic cohort of women - The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study

被引:279
作者
Song, Yiqing
Manson, JoAnn E.
Tinker, Lesley
Howard, Barbara V.
Kuller, Lewis H.
Nathan, Lauren
Rifai, Nader
Liu, Simin
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Prevent Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[6] MedStar Res Inst, Washington, DC USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[9] Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; PLASMA-INSULIN; RESISTANCE; NONOBESE; AMERICANS; INDEXES;
D O I
10.2337/dc07-0358
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), based on plasma levels of fasting glucose and insulin. has been widely validated and applied for quantifying insulin resistance and P-cell function. However, prospective data regarding its relation to diabetes risk in ethnically diverse populations are limited. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Among 82,069 women who were aged 50-79 years, free of cardiovascular disease or diabetes, and participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study, we conducted a nested case-control study to prospectively examine the relations of HOMA of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-B) with diabetes risk. During a median follow-up period of 5.9 years, 1,584 diabetic patients were 0 matched with 2,198 control subjects by age, ethnicity, clinical center, time of blood draw, and follow-up time. RESULTS - Baseline levels of fasting glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR were each significantly higher among case compared with control subjects, while HOMA-B was lower (all P values < 0.0001). After adjustment for matching factors and diabetes risk factors, all four markers were significantly associated with diabetes risk the estimated relative risks per SD increment 0 1 were 3.54 (95% CI 3.02-4.13) for fasting glucose, 2.25 (1.99-2.54) for fasting insulin, 3.40 (2.95-3.92) for HOMA-IR. and 0.57(0.51-0.63) for HOMA-B. While no statistically significant multiplicative interactions were observed between these markers and ethnicity, the associations of both HOMA-IR and HOMA-B with diabetes risk remained significant and robust in each ethnic Group, including whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians/Pacific Islanders. When evaluated jointly. the relations of HOMA-IR and HOMA-B with diabetes risk appeared to be independent and additive. HOMA -IR was more strongly associated with an increased risk than were other markers after we excluded those with fasting glucose >= 126 mg/dl at baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:1747 / 1752
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative Study Design [J].
Anderson, GL ;
Manson, J ;
Wallace, R ;
Lund, B ;
Hall, D ;
Davis, S ;
Shumaker, S ;
Wang, CY ;
Stein, E ;
Prentice, RL .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (09) :S5-S17
[2]   Assessment of insulin sensitivity from plasma insulin and glucose in the fasting or post oral glucose-load state [J].
Avignon, A ;
Boegner, C ;
Mariano-Goulart, D ;
Colette, C ;
Monnier, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 1999, 23 (05) :512-517
[3]   Population-based incidence rates and risk factors for a type 2 diabetes in white individuals - The Bruneck study [J].
Bonora, E ;
Kiechl, S ;
Willeit, J ;
Oberhollenzer, F ;
Egger, G ;
Meigs, JB ;
Bonadonna, RC ;
Muggeo, M .
DIABETES, 2004, 53 (07) :1782-1789
[4]   Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity - Studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity [J].
Bonora, E ;
Saggiani, F ;
Targher, G ;
Zenere, MB ;
Alberiche, M ;
Monauni, T ;
Bonadonna, RC ;
Muggeo, M .
DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (01) :57-63
[5]   Homeostasis model assessment as a clinical index of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients treated with sulfonylureas [J].
Emoto, M ;
Nishizawa, Y ;
Maekawa, K ;
Hiura, Y ;
Kanda, H ;
Kawagishi, T ;
Shoji, T ;
Okuno, Y ;
Morii, H .
DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (05) :818-822
[6]   Comparison of several insulin sensitivity indices derived from basal plasma insulin and glucose levels with minimal model indices [J].
García-Estévez, DA ;
Araújo-Vilar, D ;
Fiestras-Janeiro, G ;
Saavedra-González, A ;
Cabezas-Cerrato, J .
HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 2003, 35 (01) :13-17
[7]   The homeostasis model in the San Antonio Heart Study [J].
Haffner, SM ;
Miettinen, H ;
Stern, MP .
DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (07) :1087-1092
[8]   A prospective analysis of the HOMA model - The Mexico City Diabetes Study [J].
Haffner, SM ;
Gonzalez, C ;
Miettinen, H ;
Kennedy, E ;
Stern, MP .
DIABETES CARE, 1996, 19 (10) :1138-1141
[9]   Prediction of type 2 diabetes using simple measures of insulin resistance - Combined results from the San Antonio Heart Study, the Mexico City Diabetes Study, and the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study [J].
Hanley, AJG ;
Williams, K ;
Gonzalez, C ;
D'Agostino, RB ;
Wagenknecht, LE ;
Stern, MP ;
Haffner, SM .
DIABETES, 2003, 52 (02) :463-469
[10]   Visceral adiposity and the risk of impaired glucose tolerance - A prospective study among Japanese Americans [J].
Hayashi, T ;
Boyko, EJ ;
Leonetti, DL ;
McNeely, MJ ;
Newell-Morris, L ;
Kahn, SE ;
Fujimoto, WY .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (03) :650-655