The pure electrophysiology of stopping

被引:108
作者
Bekker, EM
Kenemans, JL
Hoeksma, MR
Talsma, D
Verbaten, MN
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Dept Psychopharmacol, NL-3508 TB Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Psychonom, NL-3508 TC Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Cognit Neurosci, Durham, NH USA
[4] Free Univ Amsterdam, Dept Clin Neuropsychol, Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
ADJAR; event-related potentials; overlap; response inhibition; stop-signal task; N1; P3;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2004.07.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In the stop-signal task, subjects should withhold their response in a choice reaction time task when a stop-signal, usually a tone, is presented. Successful stops have been associated with event-related potentials (ERPs) featuring a larger frontocentral positivity relative to failed stops. The functional interpretation of this stop-P3 has been disputed, because stop-ERPs are distorted by overlap from ERPs elicited by preceding go-stimuli. We effectively removed confounding potentials with the,adjacent response filter method (ADJAR)'. Confirming an interpretation in terms of response inhibition, the stop-P3 remained and overlap removal resulted in a more anterior distribution. As a new finding, the NI was larger on trials with successful stops, which suggests that inhibitory performance at least partly depended on the ability to switch attention to the stop-signal. Finally, the parietal P3 tended to peak earlier for successful than for failed stops. This is in line with the Horse Race Model, which states that faster stop-processes have a higher chance of winning the race against the go-process. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 198
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J ABNORMAL CHILD PSY
[2]  
BEKKER EM, CLIN NEUROPHYSIOL
[3]   Response priming in a go/nogo task: do we have to explain the go/nogo N2 effect in terms of response activation instead of inhibition? [J].
Bruin, KJ ;
Wijers, AA ;
van Staveren, ASJ .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 112 (09) :1660-1671
[4]   STRATEGIES AND MECHANISMS IN NONSELECTIVE AND SELECTIVE INHIBITORY MOTOR CONTROL [J].
DEJONG, R ;
COLES, MGH ;
LOGAN, GD .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1995, 21 (03) :498-511
[5]   IN SEARCH OF THE POINT OF NO RETURN - THE CONTROL OF RESPONSE PROCESSES [J].
DEJONG, R ;
COLES, MGH ;
LOGAN, GD ;
GRATTON, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (01) :164-182
[6]   Inhibitory motor control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Event-related potentials in the stop-signal paradigm [J].
Dimoska, A ;
Johnstone, SJ ;
Barry, RJ ;
Clarke, AR .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 54 (12) :1345-1354
[7]   IS THE P300 COMPONENT A MANIFESTATION OF CONTEXT UPDATING [J].
DONCHIN, E ;
COLES, MGH .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1988, 11 (03) :357-374
[8]   ERP components in Go Nogo tasks and their relation to inhibition [J].
Falkenstein, M ;
Hoormann, J ;
Hohnsbein, J .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1999, 101 (2-3) :267-291
[9]   ELECTRICAL SIGNS OF SELECTIVE ATTENTION IN HUMAN BRAIN [J].
HILLYARD, SA ;
HINK, RF ;
SCHWENT, VL ;
PICTON, TW .
SCIENCE, 1973, 182 (4108) :177-180
[10]   Reflexive attention modulates processing of visual stimuli in human extrastriate cortex [J].
Hopfinger, JB ;
Mangun, GR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (06) :441-447