A prospective, blinded, randomized, controlled clinical trial of topical negative pressure use in skin grafting

被引:213
作者
Moisidis, E [1 ]
Heath, T [1 ]
Boorer, C [1 ]
Ho, K [1 ]
Deva, AK [1 ]
机构
[1] Liverpool Hosp, Dept Plast & Maxillofacial Surg, Sydney, NSW, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.PRS.0000133168.57199.E1
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Topical negative pressure has been demonstrated to improve graft take in a number of noncomparative studies. This study aimed to assess whether split-thickness skin graft take is improved qualitatively or quantitatively with topical negative pressure therapy compared with standard bolster dressings. A blinded, prospective, randomized trial was conducted of 22 adult inpatients of Liverpool Hospital between July of 2001 and July of 2002 who had wounds requiring skin grafting. After grafting, each wound half was randomized to receive either a standard bolster dressing or a topical negative pressure dressing. Skin graft assessment was performed at 2 weeks by a single observer blinded to the randomization. Two patients were lost to follow-up and were excluded from the study. There were 20 patients (12 men and eight women) in the study group. The median patient age was 64 years (range, 27 to 88 years), and the mean wound size was 128 cm(2) (range, 35 to 450 cm(2)). The wound exposed subcutaneous fat in eight patients, muscle in six patients, paratenon in four patients, and deep fascia in two patients. At 2 weeks, wounds that received a topical negative pressure dressing had a greater degree of epithelialization in six cases (30 percent), the same degree of epithelialization in nine cases (45 percent), and less epithelialization in five cases (25 percent) compared with their respective control wounds. Graft quality following topical negative pressure therapy was subjectively determined to be better in 10 cases (50 percent), equivalent in seven cases (35 percent), and worse in three cases (15 percent). Although the quantitative graft take was not significant, the qualitative graft take was found to be significantly better with the use of topical negative pressure therapy (p < 0.05). Topical negative pressure significantly improved the qualitative appearance of split-thickness skin grafts as compared with standard bolster dressings.
引用
收藏
页码:917 / 922
页数:6
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Altman D, 1991, PRACTIAL STAT MED RE
[2]   Vacuum-assisted closure: A new method for wound control and treatment: Clinical experience [J].
Argenta, LC ;
Morykwas, MJ .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1997, 38 (06) :563-576
[3]   Negative-pressure dressings as a bolster for skin grafts [J].
Blackburn, JH ;
Boemi, L ;
Hall, WW ;
Jeffords, K ;
Hauck, RM ;
Banducci, DR ;
Graham, WP .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1998, 40 (05) :453-457
[4]   Topical negative pressure in wound management [J].
Deva, AK ;
Buckland, CH ;
Fisher, E ;
Liew, SCC ;
Merten, S ;
McGlynn, V ;
Gianoutsos, MP ;
Baldwin, MAR ;
Lendvay, PG .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2000, 173 (03) :128-131
[5]   Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds: a systematic review [J].
Evans, D ;
Land, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 54 (03) :238-242
[6]   Abdominoplasty wound-healing complications: assisted closure using foam suction dressing [J].
Fenn, CH ;
Butler, PEM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 2001, 54 (04) :348-351
[7]   A controlled subatmospheric pressure dressing increases the rate of skin graft donor site reepithelialization [J].
Genecov, DG ;
Schneider, AM ;
Morykwas, MJ ;
Parker, D ;
White, WL ;
Argenta, LC .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1998, 40 (03) :219-225
[8]  
Greer S E, 1999, J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, V26, P250
[9]   The use of subatmospheric pressure dressing for the coverage of radial forearm free flap donor-site exposed tendon complications [J].
Greer, SE ;
Longaker, MT ;
Margiotta, M ;
Mathews, AJ ;
Kasabian, A .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1999, 43 (05) :551-554
[10]   Vacuum-assisted closure in the treatment of degloving injuries [J].
Meara, JG ;
Guo, LF ;
Smith, JD ;
Pribaz, JJ ;
Breuing, KH ;
Orgill, DP .
ANNALS OF PLASTIC SURGERY, 1999, 42 (06) :589-594