Fruits and vegetables and endometrial cancer risk: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

被引:55
作者
Bandera, Elisa V.
Kushi, Lawrence H.
Moore, Dirk F.
Gifkins, Dina M.
McCullough, Marjorie L.
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch, Canc Inst New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08903 USA
[2] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, Sch Publ Hlth, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Div Res, Oakland, CA USA
[4] Amer Canc Soc, Atlanta, GA 30329 USA
来源
NUTRITION AND CANCER-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL | 2007年 / 58卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01635580701307929
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Endometrial cancer is the most common female gynecological cancer in the United States. Although obesity is a well-established risk factor, the role of other dietary factors is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to summarize and quantify the current evidence for fruit and vegetable intake and endometrial cancer by conducting a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Searches were conducted to identify relevant papers published up to June 2006 in various databases. We included peer-reviewed manuscripts published in any language. Random and fixed-effects pooled risk estimates were estimated. We found one cohort study and 16 case-control studies evaluating various aspects of consumption. The random-effects summary estimates (95% CI) comparing high vs. low categories of intake reported were 0.71 (0.55-0.91) for total vegetables based on 10 studies, 0.85 (0.74-0.97) for cruciferous vegetables based on seven studies, and 0.90 (0.72-1.12) for total fruit based on 14 studies. For 100 g/day intake, summary ORs were 0.90 (0.86-0.95) for total vegetables, 0.79 (0.69-0.90) for cruciferous vegetables, and 0.97 (0.92-1.02) for total fruit. Excluding studies not meeting certain quality criteria provided similar results. The current evidence, based solely on case-control studies, with less than half being population-based, suggests a modest inverse association with vegetable consumption, particularly for cruciferous vegetables. We did not find any cohort studies evaluating fruit and vegetables separately. No firm conclusion can be drawn at this time in the absence of additional well-conducted population-based studies and, particularly, prospective data.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 21
页数:16
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], IARC HDB CANC PREV
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1997, FOOD NUTR PREV CANC
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2006, Cancer Facts and Figures
  • [4] Bandera EV, 2004, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V159, pS106
  • [5] DIET AND ENDOMETRIAL CANCER - A CASE-CONTROL STUDY
    BARBONE, F
    AUSTIN, H
    PARTRIDGE, EE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1993, 137 (04) : 393 - 403
  • [6] BOONE CW, 1990, CANCER RES, V50, P2
  • [7] BURKE TW, 2001, CANC PRINCIPLES PRAC
  • [8] Chene G, 1996, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V144, P610
  • [9] Adulthood consumption of preserved and nonpreserved vegetables and the risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A systematic review
    Gallicchio, Lisa
    Matanoski, Genevieve
    Tao, Xuguang
    Chen, Liwei
    Lam, Tram K.
    Boyd, Kristina
    Robinson, Karen A.
    Balick, Lyssa
    Mickelson, Stephanie
    Caulfield, Laura E.
    Herman, James G.
    Guallar, Eliseo
    Alberg, Anthony J.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2006, 119 (05) : 1125 - 1135
  • [10] The possible role of female sex hormones in milk from pregnant cows in the development of breast, ovarian and corpus uteri cancers
    Ganmaa, D
    Sato, A
    [J]. MEDICAL HYPOTHESES, 2005, 65 (06) : 1028 - 1037