The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method

被引:789
作者
Andrews, SS
Karlen, DL
Cambardella, CA
机构
[1] USDA, NRCS, Soil Qual Inst, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Tilth Lab, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2136/sssaj2004.1945
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Erosion rates and annual soil loss tolerance (T) values in evaluations of soil management practices have served as focal points for soil quality (SQ) research and assessment programs for decades. Our objective is to enhance and extend current soil assessment efforts by presenting a framework for assessing the impact of soil management practices on soil function. The tool consists of three steps: indicator selection, indicator interpretation, and integration into an index. The tool's framework design allows researchers to continually update and refine the interpretations for many soils, climates, and land use practices. The tool was demonstrated using data from case studies in Georgia, Iowa, California, and the Pacific Northwest (WA, ID, OR). Using an expert system of decision rules as an indicator selection step successfully identified indicators for the minimum data set (MDS) in the case study data sets. In the indicator interpretation step, observed indicator data were transformed into unitless scores based on site-specific algorithmic relationships to soil function. The scored data resulted in scientifically defensible and statistically different treatment means in the four case studies. The efficacy of the indicator interpretation step was evaluated with stepwise regressions using scored and observed indicators as independent variables and endpoint data as iterative dependent variables. Scored indicators usually had coefficients of determination (RI) that were similar or greater than those of the observed indicator values. In some cases, the R-2 values for indicators and endpoint regressions were higher when examined for individual treatments rather than the entire data set. This study demonstrates significant progress toward development of a SQ assessment framework for adaptive soil resource management or monitoring that is transferable to a variety of climates, soil types, and soil management systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1945 / 1962
页数:18
相关论文
共 109 条
[91]  
Smith J. L., 1996, Methods for assessing soil quality., P169
[92]   The system of assessment of soil degradation [J].
Snakin, VV ;
Krechetov, PP ;
Kuzovnikova, TA ;
Alyabina, IO ;
Gurov, AF ;
Stepichev, AV .
SOIL TECHNOLOGY, 1996, 8 (04) :331-343
[93]   Quality soil management or soil quality management: Performance versus semantics [J].
Sojka, RE ;
Upchurch, DR ;
Borlaug, NE .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 79, 2003, 79 :1-68
[94]  
Sparling G. P., 1997, P97
[95]  
Sparling G. P., 1993, Soil organic matter dynamics and the sustainability of tropical agriculture: proceedings of an International Symposium, Leuven, Belgium, 4-6 November 1991., P21
[96]  
TANJI KK, 1990, MANUAL AM SOC CIV EN, V71
[97]  
Thomas G. W., 1996, Methods of soil analysis. Part 3 - chemical methods., P475
[98]   THE ROLE OF SOIL ORGANIC-MATTER IN SUSTAINING SOIL FERTILITY [J].
TIESSEN, H ;
CUEVAS, E ;
CHACON, P .
NATURE, 1994, 371 (6500) :783-785
[99]  
Turco R. F., 1994, V35, P73
[100]  
TYSON SC, 1994, THESIS U GEORGIA ATH