Fine-spray (water mist) protection of shipboard engine rooms

被引:22
作者
Bill, RG [1 ]
Hansen, RL
Richards, K
机构
[1] Factory Mutual Engn & Res Corp, Norwood, MA 02062 USA
[2] US Coast Guard Res & Dev Ctr, Groton, CT 06340 USA
[3] Worcester Polytech Inst, Ctr Fire Safety Studies, Worcester, MA 01689 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0379-7112(97)00017-9
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Twenty-three fire tests were conducted to determine the ability of current fine-spr ay (water mist) technologies to extinguish fires specified in the International Maritime Organization (IMO) fire test procedure for engine rooms gr eater than 3000 m(3). The tests were conducted using nozzles installed at a 5 m height and 1.5 m spacing in a large test facility (2800 m(2) area and 18 m height). Two types of nozzles were tested: a low pressure nozzle operating between 1.2 and 1.5 MPa with flow per nozzle between 12.0 and 13.41/m and a multi-nozzle high-pressure prototype consisting of seven nozzles operating at 6.9 MPa flowing at 5.3 1/m per prototype. These nozzles were selected because they had been shown to extinguish IMO fire tests in enclosures with a protected area of 83 m(2) and a ceiling height of 4.5 m. The fire tests selected from the IMO procedure included 6 MW diesel spray fires on top of the IMO engine mock-up, a shielded 6 MW diesel spl ay fire adjacent to the mock-tip a 1 MW shielded diesel spray fire adjacent to the mock-up, and a wood crib within a 2 m(2) pan filled with heptane. In tests in which no additional enclosure surrounded the nozzles other than the test facility, fires were not significantly affected by the water mist using either nozzle. To further investigate mist-system capabilities, a ceiling was then placed directly over the nozzles at a 5 m height covering an area of 188 m(2). Using 90 high-pressure prototype nozzles, the test fires were not extinguished. A 940 m(3) enclosure was then formed by dropping tarpaulins to the floor from the ceiling. A 4 m(2) vent was placed in the wall. With the 90 high-pressure prototype nozzles, the 6 MW spray fire on top of the mock-up was extinguished. When the 6 MW fire was shielded beside the mock-up, the fire was not extinguished With the vent closed, the 6 MW shielded spray fire was extinguished. Under the same test conditions, a 1 MW shielded diesel spray fire and a 0.1 m(2) heptane pool fire were not extinguished. The fire test results indicated that protection of engine rooms with volumes of about 1000 m(3) is possible by optimizing current fine-spray technology while significantly larger volumes will require improved discharge characteristics. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 336
页数:20
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
BACK GG, 1996, NRLMR6180967814
[2]  
GRANT CC, 1994, NEPPJ NOV, P40
[3]  
MAWHINNEY JR, 1994, INT ASS FIR SAF SCI, P47
[4]  
PEPI JS, 1995, P HAL OPT TECHN WORK
[5]  
*SPRAYING SYST CO, 1969, 1182528 SPRAYING SYS
[6]  
*SPRAYING SYST CO, 1983, 1182540 SPRAYING SYS
[7]  
URAL EA, 1995, P HAL OPT TECHN WORK
[8]  
*US EPA, 1995, PROT STRAT OZ ACC SU, V60
[9]  
WIGHUS R, 1993, P INT C WAT MIST FIR