The effects of selected antidepressant drugs on timing behaviour in rats

被引:34
作者
Bayley, PJ [1 ]
Bentley, GD [1 ]
Dawson, GR [1 ]
机构
[1] Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd, Res Labs, Neurosci Res Ctr, Harlow CM20 2QR, Essex, England
关键词
antidepressant; d-amphetamine; clomipramine; diazepam; imipramine; zimelidine; peak procedure; rat; timing;
D O I
10.1007/s002130050546
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
It has been suggested that the increased reinforcement rate on a differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate of responding (DRL) schedule observed following acute antidepressant administration in the rat is due to an improvement in timing accuracy. The aim of the present work was to evaluate the effects of antidepressants in another schedule that requires accurate estimation of time intervals, the peak procedure. Three antidepressant drugs were tested, the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine (1.0-10.0 mg/kg, IP) and the 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, zimelidine (10.0-40.0 mg/kg, IP) and clomipramine (1.0-10.0 mg/kg, IP). For reference, the full benzodiazepine receptor agonist, diazepam (1.0-5.0 mg/kg, IP) and the psychomotor stimulant, d-amphetamine (0.5-1.5 mg/kg, SC) were also tested. All doses of d-amphetamine tested significantly increased lever-pressing rates, whereas all the other compounds induced significant decreases in lever-pressing rates. Overall, the time at which the maximal lever-pressing rate occurred was not altered by any of the compounds, suggesting that timing accuracy was not significantly affected by any of the compounds administered. The only exception was zimelidine (40.0 mg/kg), which reduced the time at which the maximal lever-pressing rate occurred, although lever-pressing rates were also significantly reduced at this dose. These data suggest that previously reported antidepressant-induced improvement in performance on the DRL schedule may not have been due to improved timing accuracy per se but may have been due to a decrease in lever-pressing rates.
引用
收藏
页码:114 / 122
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   SYMMETRICAL AND ASYMMETRICAL SOURCES OF VARIANCE IN TEMPORAL GENERALIZATION [J].
CHURCH, RM ;
MILLER, KD ;
MECK, WH ;
GIBBON, J .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1991, 19 (03) :207-214
[2]   Effects of chlorpromazine and diazepam on time estimation behavior and motivation in rats [J].
Ferguson, SA ;
Paule, MG .
PHARMACOLOGY BIOCHEMISTRY AND BEHAVIOR, 1996, 53 (01) :115-122
[3]   COMPARISON OF VARIANCE AND COVARIANCE PATTERNS IN PARALLEL AND SERIAL THEORIES OF TIMING [J].
GIBBON, J ;
CHURCH, RM .
JOURNAL OF THE EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF BEHAVIOR, 1992, 57 (03) :393-406
[4]  
Gray J., 1987, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY ANXI
[5]   Effects of desipramine and fluvoxamine on timing behaviour investigated with the fixed interval peak procedure and the interval bisection task [J].
Ho, MY ;
AlZahrani, SSA ;
Martinez, DNV ;
Cabrera, ML ;
Bradshaw, CM ;
Szabadi, E .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 125 (03) :274-284
[6]   EFFECTS OF IMIPRAMINE, BUPROPION, CHLORPROMAZINE, AND CLOZAPINE ON DIFFERENTIAL-REINFORCEMENT-OF-LOW-RATE (DRL) GREATER-THAN 72-SEC AND GREATER-THAN 36-SEC SCHEDULES IN RAT [J].
HOWARD, JL ;
POLLARD, GT .
DRUG DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 1984, 4 (06) :607-616
[7]  
MAREK GJ, 1989, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V250, P52
[8]  
MAREK GJ, 1988, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V244, P650
[9]  
MAREK GJ, 1989, J PHARMACOL EXP THER, V250, P60
[10]  
MAREK GJ, 1988, PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, V96, P123